I agree that a woman is entitled to control her body, and determined if she is ready to be a Mother or not. However, according to the 10th amendment of the constitution--The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Shouldn't a man have a choice about if he wants to bear responsability or whether he wants a role at all in the life of a child without being force by the government or the state. I understand that is a woman's body and her choice, but why should her choice diminish mine, why should a man have not choice on whether he is ready or not to be a father. Should't a man have a right to financial abortion if he wants??
I think that is pretty interesting seeing how you quoted part of the Bill of rights. You probably have also heard of the 8th and amendment which states "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, NOR CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT INFLICTED". Our Society has already deemed execution (aka KILLING) as the worst punishment our government can inflict. Aborting a child would also be against the Constitution if you put it that way. If a woman or the male doesn't want to have a child then...
1. Don't have sex
2. Put him/her up for adoption
3. Assume Responsibility for their "little accident"
Why should some irresponsible "parents" have the right to kill a perfectly innocent child. Which I might add that our country is built on the principles of the LIFE, LIBERTY and pursuit of happiness.
The 9th amendment states "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.". The unborn child is a homiosapien and homiosapiens are humans. Humans are people translating scientifically the fetus is technically a human being.