Find the mistakes to my impossible equations.
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style:  Open  Point System:  7 Point  
Started:  10/8/2011  Category:  Education  
Updated:  5 years ago  Status:  Voting Period  
Viewed:  906 times  Debate No:  18663 
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)
I would like to thank my challenger for accepting my debate.
In this debate, I will be arguing that 0=2 and that 1+1=∞. There is not one, but two. (stating that 1 does not equal 2) There is none, but two. There is none and two. Therefore 0=2. H=Change in HE=(Hm)cc E=0m Therefore, H0m=(Hm)cc H0m/cc=Hm 0m=0 (H0)/cc=Hm Therefore, H∞=Hm Therefore, 1+1=∞ The rules of this debate are as follows: Con will locate my errors in each of the progressions. He will have two rounds to do so. On the second round, I will either confirm or deny con's answers. On the third round, I will confirm or show con the answers. Con's third round, however, will count for nothing as I will have said the answers beforehand.
Your mistake is the same as every other equation that proves that 1=2 or 1=0 or anything of the sort. Your mistake is that you divide by zero. In an elborate way, no doubt, but it is illegal mathematically. As i say in my precal class when we find holes in rational functions: divide by zero breaks math. 

Con has stated that I divided by zero and this is what created my infinite, however this is not the mistake, as all infinitives can be deduced by Planck's Constant, an imaginary number in which K X K=∞. This constant therefore reduces infinitives to finite numbers. In this case it is not the lack of Planck's Constant that is wrong, as the constant is applied to equations without necessary appearance.
Also con has not specified in which location I am incorrect in the following: "There is not one, but two. (stating that 1 does not equal 2) There is none, but two. There is none and two. Therefore 0=2." Keep looking mate. riddick1128 forfeited this round. 

Con has failed to locate the mistakes in my progressions.
The mistake in my first progression is that none means 'not one', therefore "There is none and two" is a possible phrase, but this does not conclude that 0=2, as none is not equal to 0. The mistake in my second progression is that, although energy contains 0mass and is literally a particle with no mass, this does not mean that energy is purely nothing. E contains 0m, but is not equal to 0m. riddick1128 forfeited this round. 
Post a Comment
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by imabench 5 years ago
you cannot just negate the third round, debates are structured so that one person can always offer a counterpoint to the instigator, those are the rules and thats how voters will feel about it
Report this Comment
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Leftii  riddick1128  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  4  0 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by Manisgood 5 years ago
Leftii  riddick1128  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  4  0 
Reasons for voting decision: Con failed to find the mistakes in Pro's impressive equations; the notions about energy's mass and semantics was interesting, though Con's argument was quite pedestrian at best (dividing by zero is assumed to be a common mathematical mistake).