The Instigator
Morningstar100
Pro (for)
Losing
2 Points
The Contender
w.toosmart
Con (against)
Winning
11 Points

Food

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
w.toosmart
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/24/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,664 times Debate No: 32882
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (4)

 

Morningstar100

Pro

I love food. do you?
w.toosmart

Con

No, I don't like food. This is a stupid topic to debate about.
Debate Round No. 1
Morningstar100

Pro

Your a buttt head... lolololollz
w.toosmart

Con

Nice language. Also nice spelling.
Debate Round No. 2
Morningstar100

Pro

Ididn't mean it in a bad way, since were friends I thought it was funny.
w.toosmart

Con

Still, nice spelling and punctuation. You spelled we're wrong, you spelled were. It is still a stupid topic. Plus, be more specific, what type of food? Also, we need food to live, so there is nothing to debate about. I still don't like eating.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by elPresidente 3 years ago
elPresidente
Food is the leading cause of obesity.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by MrJosh 3 years ago
MrJosh
Morningstar100w.toosmartTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: Uh...
Vote Placed by jarret 3 years ago
jarret
Morningstar100w.toosmartTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: ........ no comment
Vote Placed by toolpot462 3 years ago
toolpot462
Morningstar100w.toosmartTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:11 
Reasons for voting decision: I'm going to have to side with Anon's infinite wisdom.
Vote Placed by Anon_Y_Mous 3 years ago
Anon_Y_Mous
Morningstar100w.toosmartTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:11 
Reasons for voting decision: Spelling goes to Con because, as he made it quite clear, Pro had many, many errors. However, it was impolite to point out these errors, so conduct goes to Pro. No one made any arguments or supplied sources.