Ford is better than Chevy
Debate Rounds (2)
PRO bears the entirety of the burden of proof, and must demonstrate that Ford is objectively superior to Chevy. Since this is often a matter of subjective opinion, he must in the process both (a) evidence the individual points he's making and (b) establish a framework by which to establish objectivity superiority. If he fails to do that, you default to a CON ballot.
This means that PRO must prove:
Ford > Chevy
If, by the end of the debate, the following two options are still on the table --
Chevy = Ford
Chevy < Ford
-- or there's considerable uncertainty, you default to CON.
Now, read PRO's opening remark: he says Ford is "better quality."
This, my friends, is circular: he's presuming the resolution via merely restating it. He needs to explain *why* this is the case.
He thing brings up two features: there's no comparison, there's no elucidation of these features, there's no objective criterion. These points do literally nothing to advance his BOP.
wschrab forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Rosalie 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||1|
Reasons for voting decision: PRO ff.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.