The Instigator
Jaluzi123
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
M9
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

Foreign Intervention in Syria

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
M9
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/7/2013 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 912 times Debate No: 38615
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

Jaluzi123

Pro

The UN should intervene in Syria because of the growing humanitarian crisis.
M9

Con

The US should not intervene in Syria because it is not our place to act. In addition both sides of the civil war have committed many atrocities, which makes it morally wrong to support either side. The Free Syrian Army, the main opposition in Syria is also affiliated with Al-Qaeda. Supporting them with weapons would be like repeating our mistake in Afghanistan where we supported the Mujaheddin. If Assad falls in any case, Syria will collapse into sectarian chaos like post-Saddam Iraq.There will be brutal persecution of the Alawite group that Assad belongs to. For all these reasons, the US should support a diplomatic solution rather than a military intervention.
Debate Round No. 1
Jaluzi123

Pro

Jaluzi123 forfeited this round.
M9

Con

Foreign intervention in Syria will do more harm than good as shown above. Allowing the regime to be toppled could create a violent anarchic state like Somalia which has spawned Al-Shabaab one of the most dangerous terrorist groups. Look at what happened in Libya and Egypt and in Iran the 1970's with the toppling of the Shah. To protect human life and rights it is paramount that the international community work towards stability in Syria, not an overthrow of Assad, however distasteful he may be. Some countries simply are not advanced enough for government without brute force. Syria needs a powerful regime to prevent the more dangerous, more radical elements from gaining power as they often do. Look at the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan after we defeated the Communists. For these reasons, there should be foreign intervention is Syria.
Debate Round No. 2
Jaluzi123

Pro

Jaluzi123 forfeited this round.
M9

Con

Entering Syria would be very bad for the US. Either they would end up helping the Wahabbi funded rebels who are bound to become terrorists, or they could support Assad who is internationally unpopular and his days are numbered anyways. Which would put us even more at odds with the radicals that will take over. Supporting Assad would also make the US more unpopular in the international community. For these reasons, and the many domestic problems it faces. The US should not get involved in a war that's not theirs to fight.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Cermank 3 years ago
Cermank
UN, not US...
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Jakeross6 3 years ago
Jakeross6
Jaluzi123M9Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: I like how he is arguing yesterday's debate. A diplomatic solution has already been found for the chemical weapons. Along with the fact that if any nation wanted to intervene, it should be Russia, who has more interests in the country.