Fox News is the most unreliable News Station.
Debate Rounds (3)
Reliability vs Validity
Even if the actual content of Fox News is not entirely valid or objective in nature, it is most certainly reliable regardless of these faults. Reliability is linked to the consistency of something to produce similar results over time, validity is linked to the closeness of what is being told to what is probably true (closely linked to accuracy rather than reliability).
Fox News is Reliable
24 hours a day, 7 days a week Fox News runs its website and very much of these hours it is either airing, discovering news, producing reports based on them, carrying out interviews or doing all at once. It is consistently bias to the right-wing, Conservative views of Rupert Murdoch.
If I may add in a new piece to my argument, Fox News is considered "MSNBC's conservative evil twin".
If you compare these 2 they both are shockingly inaccurate, and as said before. If you give out misinformed information, that information is unreliable.
To back up my argument "The Science of Fox News: Why Its Viewers Are the Most Misinformed": http://www.alternet.org...
To further counter me, Pro tries to show Fox News to be evil but many evil people can be reliable in their consistent malice while many good people can be unreliable to always be benevolent. Reliability is not correlated with moral benevolence at all.
Pro has yet to show how Fox News is not reliable and consistent in its bias and malice. For this reason I win since Pro had the burden of proof.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.