The Instigator
RUN4ACES
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
wildcat101
Con (against)
Winning
1 Points

Fundamental laws of motion missing on 9-11-2001

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
wildcat101
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/31/2014 Category: Science
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 427 times Debate No: 51274
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

RUN4ACES

Pro

I contend the impact to both towers on 9-11 could not have been from planes the Govt. and Media claims were used. Furthermore the official story cannot continue past the impact of the planes or past the initiation of collapse, since fundamental laws of motion were violated at both at these events. Specifically the 3rd law of motion which states "For every action there is a equal and opposite reaction" prevents the planes from busting through structural box steel 30" apart on center and steel reinforced concrete floor slabs without slowing down or lighter materials falling to the street below.

I further contend not only should the Towers remain standing they should not have collapsed at all. Certainly not with free fall acceleration through 95 floors without the impact force of each floors below stopping the collapse in no more than 15 floors.
wildcat101

Con

I will gladly accept your challenge. I am happy to be able to debate this topic with you, as their is much controversy, and I love talking about topics like these. May the best debater win.
Debate Round No. 1
RUN4ACES

Pro

RUN4ACES forfeited this round.
wildcat101

Con

wildcat101 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
RUN4ACES

Pro

RUN4ACES forfeited this round.
wildcat101

Con

For the voters of this debate I strongly urge that You vote for me because I am at least making the effort and still have not heard back from my opponent
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by ESocialBookworm 3 years ago
ESocialBookworm
RUN4ACESwildcat101Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited first and more times.