GMO's Are Dangerous and Should Be Banned
Debate Rounds (3)
Genetically modified organisms, also know as GMO's are a hazard to the world and should be banned until there is scientific proof that it is safe.
GMO's have little to no scientific proof that its benefits are greater. However, there are indeed proof on the white mice, which showed signs of premature growth, smaller brains, the inability to reproduce, and large tumors. Different substances should not be mixed, and Mother Nature should not be defied.
Even in the slim chance that it may not be harmful, it is also taking over organic fields. Despite not being able to reproduce, the modified plants easily contaminates nearby fields, and using this as an advantage, organic farmers were forced to pay the GMO companies for using their technology even though they didn't want to. At this rate, it wouldn't be long before organic foods disappear off the face of Earth.
A very suspicious fact about GMO's is that companies are spending millions to prevent modified foods from being labeled as "Genetically Modified." That hints at how the food is unstable, and the companies are attempting to hide it.
Do you have any proof that the benefits to their use far outweighs their non-use?
There is certainly some scientific proof that each is effective because they would not release it or pay to fund a project that doesn't render a superior product or better crop yields. If GMO's did things worse than the norm ... no company would pay for them as their cost would be higher than just using, say, plain old tomatoes.
I can't say I agree with the aggressive patent and lawsuit practices they participate in, but I venture to guess those are brought on too by the negativity perpetuated aver a perfectly fine product they just got done spending millions on developing. Its sad they feel they need to offset that cost by way of lawsuits ... but I'm certain they take their fair share of licks from the organic crowd as well.
I think organic farming is being misrepresented as some grassroots small business that's being kicked around by big business. There are plenty of organic brands linked in farming networks the same as any other food producing market, just like the GMO guys, just like Purdue, and any other. Organic vs. GMO are just two corporations fighting each other for business. Organic wins their crowd through scare tactics and public perception and GMO tries to win theirs through scientific improvement to plants and animals for better food yield and by means of patent protection. GMOs aim to target the masses by beating out their competition with lower prices, organic tend to target the wealthy privileged few. The US just happens to have a lot of people who take to fads and have generally more disposable income to spend on the image organic brands are selling them on.
Frankly we've already defied mother nature to the extent that this type of food optimization is necessary to maintain the population we've grown to. If you wanted to wipe every food modification ever performed off the map today, you'd start a worldwide depression and so many would starve. I don't know your financial background, but i'd venture to guess you wouldn't be able to afford enough of the organic food you're fighting for to be able to feed your family. And lets hope you ate it immediately because organic food has substantially less shelf life to boot. (i.e. food shipments cost more and contain less choices)
(Why on earth did I open a 3 round argument?!)
Anywayy, if the modified foods are better, then why are organic foods more expensive? Also, did you know that all of the following countries enforced labeling policies?
Australia, Austria. Belgium, Bulgaria, China, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Greenland, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom
I'm quite sure the government of these countries aren't stupid. They knew GMO's are not properly tested so they wanted to give the people a choice. By saying this I am not saying GMO's have never been tested. They have, but not enough.
As a kid, I'm not confident if this sounds "normal" or not, but when you said "Organic vs. GMO are just two corporations fighting each other for business. Organic wins their crowd through scare tactics and public perception and GMO tries to win theirs through scientific improvement to plants and animals for better food yield and by means of patent protection," I had a picture in my mind where there is a horde of zombies (GMO, since they're both "mutated") trying to take over the mass of surviving humans (Organic, because both are natural") , like the IOS (or android I'm not sure) game "World Zombination."
They're tested well enough to pass FDA standards. Some organic foods can't even claim that level of cleanliness (though admittedly is quite low). Its acceptable.
Yes, your last paragraph about the vision people have over GMO's is exactly the type of 'scare tactic' type image that has unjustly grown around their use. Its of course nothing like that. The modifications are actually much more simple than some zombification virus like in resident evil. Its just stuff like making the outer cell wall of a fruit slightly thicker to make it more resilient to bugs and weather, making a strain more 'horny', as it were, so it attempts to reproduce even out of season, strengthening the immune systems of plants so they are less susceptible to pestilence and other sickness that might kill them and decrease yield.
Basically we do it to our own bodies to prolong our lifetime, why not prolong the life of our food sources such that we can continue to benefit from them for much longer periods.
On a side tangent, there is a level of consistency you get from a company making the entire genome of a strain proprietary. They know it and basically clone it. You know what you're getting. Organic foods are far less controlled and you could actually be subject to mutational effects that come from plants constantly reproducing. I can't say I've seen it be a problem that has escaped its own demise or was ever not filtered out by FDA or some other quality control ... but there is some risk there. Risk in leaving things up to nature to decide what its gonna dump on you this week. Bad weather, pestilence, bad crop.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.