The Instigator
Hello1647583
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
imabench
Con (against)
Winning
23 Points

GOD or SATAN

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
imabench
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/15/2015 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 722 times Debate No: 71730
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (9)
Votes (5)

 

Hello1647583

Pro

I Choose Life, bread for bread I 'DO', Your Tower is Falling
imabench

Con

I choose Satan, for Satan only killed about 10 people in the entire Bible whereas the number of people God has killed is close to 2.5 million

http://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com...

The 10 people Satan did kill though was all part of a bet that God had with Satan, so essentially, God allowed Satan to kill those 10 people

http://rationalwiki.org...

Satan is more caring then God, Hail Satan!
Debate Round No. 1
Hello1647583

Pro

I State:
***Humans shall have the freedom to Love.
***Humans shall have no freedom to evil.

I cannot go against the home, speak for the home, nor have authority over the home of my neighbors in which I do not own. I am not a Christian, you need to also reference all religion buddy.

My sportsmanship touch":
***My purpose is to change while my pen writes I am teaching.
***Done is the finish; let me free my knife twice, I am.
imabench

Con

Pro is retarded, vote con

Why was I specifically challenged to this debate again?
Debate Round No. 2
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by BarbieSoFetch 2 years ago
BarbieSoFetch
Aye, you are not a bench!😬 @imabench
Posted by imabench 2 years ago
imabench
damn guys turn the triggered level down to a 7
Posted by BarbieSoFetch 2 years ago
BarbieSoFetch
Omfg, literally the easiest debate to win...This is why you should actually type something more than God is better than satan. Actually explain yourself. God is the obvious answer.
Posted by Leo.Messi 2 years ago
Leo.Messi
really imabench? Thought you where better than calling your opponent names...
Posted by bluesteel 2 years ago
bluesteel
======================================================================
>Reported: 430miletime // REMOVED<

7 points to Pro. {RFD = Reasons for voting decision: The con side does not know the reason why God killed those people. Also the con side used an urealiable source by using a blogspot website.}

[*Reason for removal*] (1) Pro did not use any sources, so it is invalid to conclude that Pro had more reliable sources. (2) Failure to explain conduct and S&G vote.
======================================================================
Posted by ClashnBoom 2 years ago
ClashnBoom
How can a Christian of any branch say such things ? This is blasphemy.
Posted by imabench 2 years ago
imabench
I believe you both are idiots
Posted by Hello1647583 2 years ago
Hello1647583
I believe you are who you say you are bud.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
i choose to be god
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by tejretics 2 years ago
tejretics
Hello1647583imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's argument was childish and was barely an argument. Pro did nothing to defend his position that God is greater than Satan. Con made the only valid argument by citing the number of killings. While one reference was an opinion post, Pro had no references whatsoever. Pro's childish arguments also lacked conduct.
Vote Placed by ClashnBoom 2 years ago
ClashnBoom
Hello1647583imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was "trolling" me.
Vote Placed by Berend 2 years ago
Berend
Hello1647583imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Had better conduct over the childish act of pro. The rhetoric was better formulated. The sources used by con were much better than pro.
Vote Placed by Bennett91 2 years ago
Bennett91
Hello1647583imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:15 
Reasons for voting decision: Con called Pro retarded, so loss of conduct point. Con used sources. Con's argument, that Satan is preferable because he killed less was not challenged and Pro seemed to ramble.
Vote Placed by AngelofDeath 2 years ago
AngelofDeath
Hello1647583imabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct tied, only because Pro made no sense in stating the resolution and Con called Pro retarded. S&G go to Con because Pro?s arguments grammatically did not make any sense and there was nothing for Con to argue against. Arguments to Con because he trolled the debate well, and his arguments were kind of cute in an endearing way. Sources to Con because Pro doesn?t have any to back up his claims. GG