The Instigator
1dustpelt
Pro (for)
Winning
76 Points
The Contender
Gabbie222
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Gabbie222 should be banned.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 14 votes the winner is...
1dustpelt
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/12/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,609 times Debate No: 21935
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (12)
Votes (14)

 

1dustpelt

Pro

I propose that Gabbie222 should be banned.

Gabbie222 has started 3 spam debates.

http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

She has also started a flame war in the comments section of this one:
http://www.debate.org...

After Imabench voted against her, Gabbie222 PMed Imabench calling him an idiot.
http://www.debate.org... (Read the votes)

All of Gabbie222's arguments are terrible.

Conclusion
Gabbie222 is a troll, has lowered this site, and should be banned.
Gabbie222

Con

your foolish words amuse me
Debate Round No. 1
1dustpelt

Pro

Again, she is trolling, and has not refutted any of my arguments. Extend arguments.
Gabbie222

Con

i have the right to be on here as anyone eles
Debate Round No. 2
1dustpelt

Pro

Rebuttals

"i have the right to be on here as anyone eles"
You do not, because you have been trolling, spamming, and insulting members. According to the DDO rules, this is not allowed.

Again, she has not refuted my points.

Source
http://www.debate.org...


Gabbie222

Con

how am i spamming
Debate Round No. 3
1dustpelt

Pro

"how am i spamming"
According to the DDO Orientation:
-spamming: When a user annoys other users by posting a lot of text on nothing. There are two types of spamming. Text spamming, such as "LOLOLOLYOULOSTTHEGAMELOLOL" and argument spamming "I like cheese, do you like cheese?". Most spammers make their own threads to spam in, though if they infect a serious thread the consequences can be disastrous.
-spam debates: Debates with no purpose that are [usually] made to annoy members of DDO. Some spam debate resolutions: "lkdfsall;kklasdfjlk" or "Rabbits will eat my opponent". Do not confuse with joke debates, which are non-serious resolutions with serious arguments.

You posted three spam debates, "I am awesome" "Dr. Pepper" and "idk I just wanna debate"
You are spamming.

Again, she did not refute my points.

http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
Gabbie222

Con

........ watevs
Debate Round No. 4
1dustpelt

Pro

Conclusion

It is clear that Gabbie222 is a troll, spammer, and should be banned in order for the quality of this site to be preserved.

Gabbie222 has not refuted any of my points.

Gabbie222 has started 3 spam debates.

http://www.debate.org......
http://www.debate.org......
http://www.debate.org......

She has also started a flame war in the comments section of this one:
http://www.debate.org......

After Imabench voted against her, Gabbie222 PMed Imabench calling him an idiot.
http://www.debate.org...... (Read the votes)

I trust the audience to vote their best choice.
Gabbie222

Con

im only 13 leave me alone
Debate Round No. 5
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by 1dustpelt 4 years ago
1dustpelt
Yeah. And Con's one to talk about spelling wrong.
Posted by Wallstreetatheist 4 years ago
Wallstreetatheist
Good debate (trial)!
It really doesn't take much for a person to get banned though. Some users get banned for cursing once, having funny screen names, or forfeiting debates.
Posted by 1dustpelt 4 years ago
1dustpelt
lol
Posted by hunnydew 4 years ago
hunnydew
Im soo glad that she is banned.

Hunnydew may now read dabates in peace.
Posted by 1dustpelt 4 years ago
1dustpelt
Wooohoo! Banned!
Posted by alkid96 4 years ago
alkid96
Clearly it's not your quote. I say it some book inread in the third grade. It was called "the adventures of goth girl and nerd boy" and it is part of your qoute and it's true
Posted by 1dustpelt 4 years ago
1dustpelt
Posted by Gabbie222 4 years ago
Gabbie222
that is my quote for one and its not just life sucks get over it
Posted by alkid96 4 years ago
alkid96
But like your profile says (btw i've seen that uote about 50 billion times on facebook) "Life sucks. Get over it"
Posted by Gabbie222 4 years ago
Gabbie222
:( this sucks
14 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by SuburbiaSurvivor 4 years ago
SuburbiaSurvivor
1dustpeltGabbie222Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: She already got banned and Pro's points is sexual so that needs to change.
Vote Placed by GenesisCreation 4 years ago
GenesisCreation
1dustpeltGabbie222Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: It's a silly debate but Gabbie222 certainly isn't taking her own defense seriously. Pro has sources, a resolution with substance and upheld his burden of proof. The only real counter-argument was:"I'm only 13." Con failed to show how this affects her debating ability. V-Bomb (Booooooom!)
Vote Placed by Mak-zie 4 years ago
Mak-zie
1dustpeltGabbie222Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Hmm...there's a reason she currently has zero points.
Vote Placed by Wallstreetatheist 4 years ago
Wallstreetatheist
1dustpeltGabbie222Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: YEAH
Vote Placed by vmpire321 4 years ago
vmpire321
1dustpeltGabbie222Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Tsk, tsk, tsk.
Vote Placed by alkid96 4 years ago
alkid96
1dustpeltGabbie222Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Gabbie look, i may know there's probably not a lot to do out in eastbumfuck, ohio where you live. But that doesn't mean you can come on here and spam up the site. You're trying to act more mature and older then you really are and it's not cool or endearing. Instead it makes you look like a pretentious bitch. And the fact your profile says "14" when you say 13 means you lied about your age and says you shouldn't be here. But hey maybe you can "pray to god" for some maturity. Or you could GROW UP!
Vote Placed by lannan13 4 years ago
lannan13
1dustpeltGabbie222Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: It's very obvious.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 4 years ago
16kadams
1dustpeltGabbie222Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by THEBOMB 4 years ago
THEBOMB
1dustpeltGabbie222Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: great arguments Con (sarcasm) but, seriously, if you want to debate...make an argument
Vote Placed by Yep 4 years ago
Yep
1dustpeltGabbie222Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: I'm only 13 leave me alone!!