Gay Marriage
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 14 votes the winner is...
Lordknukle
| Started: | 10/31/2011 | Category: | Society |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 921 times | Debate No: | 19067 |
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (6)
Votes (14)
 |
|
 Con  Pro I thank my opponent for that very well written and gramatically correct sentence. I was expecting a real debate, but in vain. I will only post one case as anything else would be a waste of time: C1:Economics benefits of gay marriage "The Comptroller’s Office estimates that the economic impact of marriage equality would add $142 million, on a net basis, to New York City’s economy during the three years following legislative approval. It would add about $184 million, on a net basis, in spending to the State’s economy. The $142 million benefit to New York City’s economy includes spending on weddings by New York State residents who live outside the City but choose to marry here. " http://www.debate.org...Conclusion I hoped for a real debate, but unfortunately I didn't get one. I urge the voters to vote Pro as I am the only one who presented a real case. |
 |
14 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by curious18 1 year ago
| slamjam101 | Lordknukle | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - |  | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: What is this, I don't even...
Vote Placed by jm_notguilty 1 year ago
| slamjam101 | Lordknukle | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: JVB, obvious lol.
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 1 year ago
| slamjam101 | Lordknukle | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: obvious
Vote Placed by 16kadams 1 year ago
| slamjam101 | Lordknukle | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 1 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: kinda a fail debate
Vote Placed by thett3 1 year ago
| slamjam101 | Lordknukle | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: lol
Vote Placed by Ore_Ele 1 year ago
| slamjam101 | Lordknukle | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: The debate had a lot more potential then what came out. Pro did everything he could to have a good debate, but Con was having none of that.
Vote Placed by GWindeknecht1 1 year ago
| slamjam101 | Lordknukle | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Easy win for Pro
Vote Placed by Jellopants 1 year ago
| slamjam101 | Lordknukle | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Slamjam101 wasted this debate. Shame...
Vote Placed by lotus_flower 1 year ago
| slamjam101 | Lordknukle | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Slamjam101 used the bible, for christ's sake.
Vote Placed by Cerebral_Narcissist 1 year ago
| slamjam101 | Lordknukle | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con states that gay marriage is wrong but fails to state why, instead appealing to a book of mythology that is unlikely to be true and is only relevant to a few million people at best. I took his challenge and thought about female on female action and found that to be a great idea.
However, I wanted to try being on the other side, but in vain.
I'm not interested in the topic anymore tho