I thank my opponent for that very well written and gramatically correct sentence.
I was expecting a real debate, but in vain.
I will only post one case as anything else would be a waste of time:
C1:Economics benefits of gay marriage
"The Comptroller’s Office estimates that the economic impact of marriage equality would add $142 million, on a net basis, to New York City’s economy during the three years following legislative approval. It would add about $184 million, on a net basis, in spending to the State’s economy. The $142 million benefit to New York City’s economy includes spending on weddings by New York State residents who live outside the City but choose to marry here. "
Reasons for voting decision: Con states that gay marriage is wrong but fails to state why, instead appealing to a book of mythology that is unlikely to be true and is only relevant to a few million people at best. I took his challenge and thought about female on female action and found that to be a great idea.