The Instigator
alkid96
Pro (for)
Winning
13 Points
The Contender
RussianFish99
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Gay Marriage

Do you like this debate?NoYes-4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
alkid96
Started: 1/4/2012 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 664 times Debate No: 20209
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (4)
Votes (4)

 

alkid96

Pro

Gay marrigae should be allowed in all 50 states.

There are several aspects to gay marriage. The bible/church, basic human rights, and wether homosexuality is a choice or not.

THe bible VERY clearly forbids gay marriage in the Old testament, but says nothing about it in the NEW testament. Jesus never preached anything about gays or gay marriage being wrong. Gays were often cast out of society. Jesus welcomed the outcast. He preached to love everyone, including your enemies. Many churches also forbid interacial and interfaith relationships, yet those are legal.

As human beings. we have certain rights. One of them marriage. People say gay marriage is unnatural when in reality it exists in over 450 species, including humans.

Homosexuality IS NOT a choice. Many studies have confirmed that whether you are gay or not lies in genes. In fact MANY studies confirm that there are more genes to confirm wether or not you are gay than there are when determing if you're right or left handed. And we don't punish the left handed.

I would like to end my argument on the not that I'M BISEXUAL.
RussianFish99

Con

the is no way gay marriage should be allowed at all the reason a man a women we made is to have sex and have babys and if there are gay people runing around the will be no babys
Debate Round No. 1
alkid96

Pro

OK first of all that is THE WORST argument I've ever read. I mean i had to read it a couple times just to understand it.. i mean "a man a women we made is to have sex and have babys and if there are gay people runing around the will be no babys" first of that is some of the WORST grammar ever. and two U MISSPELLED BABIES!!! WTF???

Just because there is gay marriage doesn't mean that there will not be straight marriages. Both will ALWAYS exist. And even if the entire world's population was gay we still have enough research that we could clone humans. Just as the Scottish did to Dolly the sheep.
RussianFish99

Con

WTF how the F would you clone a person WTF is wrong with you. You need to get your head looked at(:
Debate Round No. 2
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by kyro90 2 years ago
kyro90
This debate was HILARIOUS!!!!
XD
Posted by Lord_Logic 2 years ago
Lord_Logic
This was an awkward debate.
Posted by DetectableNinja 2 years ago
DetectableNinja
I'd accept (even though I'm Pro, too), but 3 hour posting times? WTF?
Posted by tkubok 2 years ago
tkubok
2 rounds... wtf.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by PeacefulChaos 2 years ago
PeacefulChaos
alkid96RussianFish99Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con made little to no arguments and resorted to using personal attacks.
Vote Placed by wiploc 2 years ago
wiploc
alkid96RussianFish99Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's OP doesn't contain an argument, just bald claims, some of which are patently wrong. Ought to be fun to destroy. But Con's 1st post doesn't engage with any of them. Instead, it makes its own bald unsupported claim. Pro refutes Con's claim. Con never refutes anything Pro says, but rather is reduced to insults. Persuasion: Pro. Not saying Pro's conduct was good, but Con wrote: "WTF is wrong with you. You need to get your head looked at(:" Conduct: Pro.
Vote Placed by baggins 2 years ago
baggins
alkid96RussianFish99Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made little effort. Con made none. 1:0 to Pro. -1 to debate
Vote Placed by cameronl35 2 years ago
cameronl35
alkid96RussianFish99Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Ridiculous arguments from Con..no evidence on either side...ad ridicul at its best
Research this debate: United States