The Instigator
koon139
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
TheHappyMAn
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Gay marriage should remain illegal

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/4/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 933 times Debate No: 43209
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (11)
Votes (0)

 

koon139

Pro

In this argument I will argue that gay marriage should remain illegal, and my opponent will argue the oppposite.
TheHappyMAn

Con

The pro has not given any reason!

WILL YOU REMAIN SILENT!

Or

WILL YOU TELL US WHY WOULD YOU CHOOSE FOR THIS!
Debate Round No. 1
koon139

Pro

In this argument I will argue that gay marriage should remain illegal, and my opponent will argue the oppposite.
TheHappyMAn

Con


HOLD IT!
CROSS EXAMINATION!


Koon's previous debates were nothing more than an act of stupidity.

Let me show you the evidence. http://www.debate.org...

In fact, his debates includes trolling debates

He chooses the most unlikly side of at most disadvantage then concludes in koon spouting nonsense.
http://www.debate.org...


Round 3, first post he decides to write this

"Omg u fgt u r posting to much, i m right u r not idc bout ur aruments, so i m right. idont care u r obviusly a omg u r not good. i am disapointed"

Thats koon, that how dumb he sounds.

As you see his opponent "MrJosh" has been a victim of his trolling.

But there are much more behind this.

In round 2 of that debate, MrJosh has put effort, thinking, time, skill and much more but "koon" decides to spout nothing more than a solution of a fanboy and a idiotic blindless Justin Bieber fan.

This means we know his phycological thinking

CROSS EXAMINATION X2 IN DEPTH

PHCOANALYSIS THINKING


There are 2 things we know about koon.

No.1 He has the mind of Justin Bieber fan

No.2 He has the thought of stupidity

This means that he has the thinking and a mind of a stupid 5 year old

What can we do with these evidence you ask.

He could be either mental or a complete idiot

Now we know why he is doing this!

Subjects of many idiots are known for being bullied is school and same for being mental.

HE CAN'T MAKE FRIENDS THEREFORE HE GOES ONLINE AND TROLL!

But your thinking "how could mind of a 5 year old do this"

It is simple. when i was five, i knew how to play Counter strike. Moving on!

"how does he know how to spell"
He asks his parents and parents care therefore parents help children in writing. FACT!

Now we know that koon has these features:

Loner
Idiot
Troll
Mind of a 5 year old
Thought of a justin bieber fan includes; blindless thoughts
That he sit on his personal computer all day
That he is a common victim of bullies

HUMAN ANATOMY OF KOON

As you see in this in this debate http://www.debate.org...

As you look at their avatars. It shows clearly that the two 4 year olds are ganging up on koon for being a Everything i listed above.
The two 4 year olds are bashing koon up but how does "koon" get bashed up.

Now, if you know anything about Human anatomy you know the term laterality which referes to the preference that most human shows one side of their body over the other as seen in this kung fu stance.
He expose one side
Bully 1 and bully 2

He got bashed because he exposed one side of his body to the other bully giving koon the lowest chance possible to attack back against bully 2.

As you see they both forfieted all roundshttp://www.debate.org...

This is because he went to hospital and the bullies were in children jail.

This shows why and how he didn't do that debate.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO NOW!
Debate Round No. 2
koon139

Pro

koon139 forfeited this round.
TheHappyMAn

Con

TheHappyMAn forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by KaleBevilacqua 3 years ago
KaleBevilacqua
@Pythos - But how is it changing straight marriage or harming other folks? All gay marriage does is give to gay people, not take from others. Even if marriage isn't viewed as symbolic or sacred anymore, so what?
Posted by Pythos 3 years ago
Pythos
I live in a country where they introduced this some years ago. Along with other measures like easy divorce, it has destroyed the institution of marriage for everyone. It has totally undermied the status of the family and everyone, especially children, are suffering because of it. Allow gay people to have their own institution and give them the same legal and financial benefits as married couples - but do NOT make the mistake they made here of radically redefining everyone's marriage just to satisfy a minuscule number of homosexuals who want to be called "married".
Posted by TheHappyMAn 3 years ago
TheHappyMAn
f yeah
Posted by TheHappyMAn 3 years ago
TheHappyMAn
Dude wtf are you doing. Are you gonna write something or your that stupid.
Posted by benl100 3 years ago
benl100
"Same love" - Macklemore

There is no reason to condemn gay marriage, those who argue it is 'wrong' or against nature refer to the bible or our genetic makeup. To the religious, I say see Leviticus 19:19, the ideals set out by this 3500 old book are out-dated and ineffective. Society is far too free-willed and developed to still rely on the primitive morals that the bible originally set out.

To those who rely on our evolution, I say the chemical imbalance in the brain which causes the anomaly that is homosexuality is a mutation to control our population. Abstract yes, google some things and tell me what you think the purpose is.. even if there is no purpose, you embrace the different, for change is good for our society.
Posted by abelsmack 3 years ago
abelsmack
Whom does it hurt?
Posted by abelsmack 3 years ago
abelsmack
Whom does it hurt?
Posted by rafeen 3 years ago
rafeen
yes, it should remain illegal, and should be condemned
Posted by TheHappyMAn 3 years ago
TheHappyMAn
3 days ago?
Posted by koon139 3 years ago
koon139
Unfortunately only you can start the debate as the system only allows the person accepting to post the response to the first round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.