I believe that people deserve to marry who they want without the judgement of other people. People can not help the way they feel. People are who they are, everyone deserves happiness in fact many of my friends are gay, bisexual, lesbian but that doesn't make them less of a friend as my straight friends. They are all equally amazing people. They breath the same air, they live on the same world, they have all the same feelings as everyone else. They are not afraid to express themselves but they often find it hard as many people are so judgmental towards them.
I understand the desire for equality in this sense,and I am sympathetic to the LGBT community. My roommate in college is gay. But the issue here is marriage. The feelings and happiness cannot interfere with law. The recent court case in the Supreme Court was unfounded. Nothing in the constitutions states that the government can manage marriage, thus, the 10th amendment states that this issue goes to the states. If said state does no want gay marriage, then it should be allowed to bar it. This is a issue of states' rights. I do not hate these people, I just want to keep with the law.
With gay marriage though you will have less transfer of STD s, I have never seen it any where in the constitution that it is gay marriages are wrong. I recently did my world history project on the constitution, when I realized that it is no where stated in the constitution that gay marriages are not allowed. So I decided to ask this; Why are people so against gay marriages? many say it is unnatural, but it really isn't, if it was unnatural I guess it is unnatural for women and men to get married, because gays feel the same way for their partners as men and women do.
The only thing that holds ground here is the constitution. It does not say that the government can regulate and make laws involving marriage, thus, under the 10th amendment, the power goes to the states. The constitution has no bias or opinion. If a power is not explicitly given to the fed, it then goes to the states. We also need to understand that in almost all regards, gay people have equal rights to everyone else. Marriage is hardly anything major when it comes to rights in light of freedom to speak, be educated, and vote.
There are more than those simple rights stated in the Constitution, people also have the freedom of religion, freedom to petition, right to bear arms. The state representatives can only go by what the people of the state want, which there are many people of those states who are gay. Many gay people are judged and looked down upon for who they are, which is not right. The states cannot always have control, the Constitution does hold very important things to it also the congress and others of the Judicial Branches have to follow it by law, or they can be taken out of office.
The percent of gay Americans ,off the top of my head, is around 5%. This is a very small number to legislate around the Constitution. There are many rights given in the Constitution, all of which gay people ought to have, BUT marriage is not one of them. I understand the hardships that the gay community must go through but gay marriage is not everything. Society is not ready for this new wave. If Congress amends the Constitution to include marriage, fine...that is the law. But until then, gay people are not granted the the right to marriage by the federal government.
Reasons for voting decision: I agreed with pro before and after the debate because con didn't say anything that would change my mind. Most of his arguments were about the fact that a law hasn't been made, not that a law shouldn't be made. Conduct goes to pro because I believe pro was more professional. Con did have better spelling and grammar that pro, as I found numerous mistakes in pro's arguments. Pro made more convincing arguments because he gave reasons why con's arguments held no ground. There weren't many sources cited on either side.