The Instigator
PoppednFresh
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TheTraditionalist
Con (against)
Winning
67 Points

Gay people cannot reproduce.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 14 votes the winner is...
TheTraditionalist
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/29/2012 Category: Health
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,336 times Debate No: 28738
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (4)
Votes (14)

 

PoppednFresh

Pro

Gay peole cannot reproduce, tgey are therefor the inferior biologocal form of humans because reproduction is a neccessary part of the continuation of pursoceity and the human race as we know of it now.
TheTraditionalist

Con

Gay people can reproduce, they just cannot reproduce with each other.
Debate Round No. 1
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by MouthWash 4 years ago
MouthWash
I'm surprised no one but me has downvoted this yet.
Posted by wrichcirw 4 years ago
wrichcirw
I just wanted to post PRO's argument without any misspelled words:

"Gay peole cannot reproduce, tgey are therefor the inferior biologocal form of humans because reproduction is a neccessary part of the continuation of pursoceity and the human race as we know of it now."

Gay cannot reproduce, are the inferior form of humans because reproduction is a part of the continuation of and the human race as we know of it now.

That was fun, lol
Posted by baseballkid 4 years ago
baseballkid
I love when a person ties to get an easy win and gets shat on.
Posted by LibertyNottyranny 4 years ago
LibertyNottyranny
Perhaps the con ought to be that a gay couple cannot reproduce by themselves.
14 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by MouthWash 4 years ago
MouthWash
PoppednFreshTheTraditionalistTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Votebomb heaven.
Vote Placed by Citrakayah 4 years ago
Citrakayah
PoppednFreshTheTraditionalistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con is right. Though it's a tad of a technicality.
Vote Placed by threenorns 4 years ago
threenorns
PoppednFreshTheTraditionalistTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: pro was just trying to legitimize homophobia. and what is pursoceity?
Vote Placed by LosLambda 4 years ago
LosLambda
PoppednFreshTheTraditionalistTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Is there even an choice to who won this debate?
Vote Placed by richarddong 4 years ago
richarddong
PoppednFreshTheTraditionalistTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: weird one round only?
Vote Placed by wrichcirw 4 years ago
wrichcirw
PoppednFreshTheTraditionalistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: yup.
Vote Placed by utahjoker 4 years ago
utahjoker
PoppednFreshTheTraditionalistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Didn't see that coming.
Vote Placed by philochristos 4 years ago
philochristos
PoppednFreshTheTraditionalistTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: If only Pro had qualified her statement.
Vote Placed by blackfirewolf 4 years ago
blackfirewolf
PoppednFreshTheTraditionalistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pure logic.
Vote Placed by UltimateSkeptic 4 years ago
UltimateSkeptic
PoppednFreshTheTraditionalistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Least amount of errors, no demeaning statements, more logic.