The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
1 Points

Geological Stratigraphy was created by the Biblical Flood

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/22/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 691 times Debate No: 88657
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)




My position is that the stratigraphy was placed in a very short amount of time during the flood event that has been recorded in the bible. All of the fossils that have been found within these layers died and were covered by sediment and fossilized in a very short amount of time (this does not exclude dinosaurs).

Accept the debate and post your opening argument! I'm looking forward to it!


My opponent is trying to postulate that the layers of the earth were formed via the Biblically described flood. I will clearly show, through just three of countless examples, that this is an impossibility.

The three argumets are as follows:

1. The perplection of Lungfish burrows

2. The problem of clay-pollen couplets

3. Challenge of sorted fossils

1) Lungfish burrows

Yes, yes I know the first question you have it: what the hell is a lungfish burrow and what does it have to do with anything? Well! I'm glad you asked!

Well look here! A lungfish burrow!

Basically, these fish made burrows in the ground during extremely dry periods to keep themselves from dying and drying out. Cool story, but does it have anything to do with the topic at hand?


Here's the scoop. Lungfish burrows appear all over the geological strata. Here's a peak at one such example from the Chinle Canyon:

Look at those beautiful strata with several occurrences of lungfish burrows! So, let me be clear. Lungfish need time in dry environments to make their burrows... so how on earth did they do that in the middle of a raging flood rapidly laying down layers?

They didn't. It's impossible. Moving on.

2) Clay-pollen couplets

Again, what the hell is this? Also called varved deposits, this is when seasonal layers are found in strata. In this case, pollen for spring and clay for winter in areas like river deltas. Long story short, we can find tens of thousands of these in single spots. The flood was only a couple thousand years ago, so this is an impossibility... especially when these layers are UNDER other flat layers of sediment, meaning they would have to have been laid down during the flood. How on earth did this happen?

It didn't. It's an impossibility.

3) Challenge to my opponent.

Find me a single mammal in a pre-Cambrian layer. If this flood was as massive and chaotic as described, there shouldn't be any order. Yet there is. A great deal in fact. And it points to evolution by means of natural selection, but that is an debate for a different date.

All I ask is that my opponent find me a paper describing a mammal in the pre-Cambrian layers.


Debate Round No. 1


1.) Lungfish burrows -- I actually went to college just an hour from the chinle formation. The most memorable thing in this area are the dinosaur footprints seen on the youngest layer of strata...I wonder how those got there. I am assuming the burrow fish made their borrows when the sea transgressed inland and Arizona was covered in water. This would allow borrow to be formed, regression of the seas, fossilization, more sediment deposits, transgression of the sea (once again) just to repeat the process for the next borrow. That is the only way I see this possibly happening. The only problem with this is the burrow fish wold die in the salt water as they are all fresh water animals. So how would of this happen? This is a canyon, remember? So the fresh water below the canyon (that is forming the canyon) is below the rim of the canyon, right? Did the fish jump out of the water onto the rim, burrow its hole, go back and get a bucket of water and fill up the hole? Could you offer a better explanation? The pictures in the article are tubular rocks. I have dug up corral and sponges near the chinle formation that look very similar. Could this just be another type of sponge?? I'm not convinced that lungfish burrows are the only explanation for this article.

2.) Clay-Pollen couplets --- I had trouble finding any scientific papers specifically talking about Clay/pollen deposits. Could you help me out and post one, I'd like to read more in depth. However, I am not disagreeing that streams (among other geological processes) still effected earth both before and after the flood. The fact that clay has been built up shouldn't be a surprise. You said "we can find tens of thousands of these in single spots." What does that mean? You make is seem as if they were deposited only every year but then they are all seen at once? This would be evidence of the flood because objects of similar densities would come together and would not be able to permeate throughout other layers of rock. Could you get a little more specific on this or post a good article that I could read? Thanks

3.) 88% of all fossils are found AFTER the precambrian. The precambrian is extremely dense, metamorphic rock that would not be lifted or separated the way sedimentary rocks can. I would only expect to see very small invertebrates in our basement rock.

Here is my challenge to you:
Why do we see dinosaur footprints preserved on layers presently exposed above ground? Did the earth just stop depositing sediment to preserve the footprints?


To be perfectly honest, not rude, I don't think my opponent understands basic geology concepts, so let me explain a little more.

Canyons were not always canyons. During times where the area is covered with water, sediments are laid down. We see this even today.

When it's dry, disconformities in the geologic record, it is eroded away. So, streams erode things (as can be clearly seen... well, anywhere). So, when lungfish are in areas of water that are not oceans (marshes, swamps, etc), but it comes to the dry season, they protect themselves by creating burrows. Sometimes these fish die in their burrows and are left there to fossilize in the mud. There was no hopping. No canyon, in fact. It was at one point a flat, water covered area.

These fish can ONLY create these burrows in muddy areas with a little time to make them. And they appear at very different times in the fossil record. My opponent is postulating these layers were made by the flood described in the Bible...

But does it make sense that these fish:

a) Were in any stable state to be able to make these burrows IN A FLOOD?
b) Had solid, yet muddy, ground ABOVE WATER to make these burrows?
c) Did this multiple times over a 40 day period, despite the fact they could never have survived it?

No. It doesn't.

Moving on back to varved layers and clay-pollen couplets

Clay-Pollen Couplets

Basically, as a reiteration, if there was any confusion, there are bi-annual layers that result from seasons during the year. Pollen during springs, clay-silt deposits in the winter. There are tens of thousands of these layers in single spots. It is unlikely a global flood laid all these layers down in a few months

Unless of course the seasons changed underwater dozens of times a day.

Here's a bit more reading material

Continuing on

Despite the fact that my opponent did not offer me a single fossil, I will still answer his objection.

"Why do we see dinosaur footprints preserved on layers presently exposed above ground? Did the earth just stop depositing sediment to preserve the footprints?"

Sadly, my opponent gave me no specific examples, but I believe this betrays his lack of knowledge on sedimentary layer deposition and erosion.

Basically, long ago these tracks were made in the mud by dinosaurs, and they were quickly filled in by other sediments. These sediments were buried. As were those that buried those. As were those that buried those that buried those.... etc.

But then! Erosion happened! And the layers began to be carved away until... dinosaur tracks appeared! They're not at the top layer, but at bottom layers exposed by erosion.

Here's a good example if you want to read more

Done with this round.
Debate Round No. 2


brill301 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3


brill301 forfeited this round.


Well... vote for Con?
Debate Round No. 4
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by boognish 2 years ago
Here's a simple experiment that pro can run to see if a single event can and will lay multiple layers of sediment, as we see in geological strata. Find a large see-through container. Fill it 1/3-1/2 full of gravel and sediment of varying grain size (large grained sand through fine silt). Top it up with water and mix it around thoroughly. After all of the sediment has settled, observe the result. What you will find is a single graded layer with gravel at the bottom, sand on top of that, and finally, the fine silt on the very top; in other words, a SINGLE geological stratum, not many. One flood event, no matter how large, will cause one graded layer of sediment to form. There is simply no geological evidence of a global flood occurring any time in the last few thousand years. There are civilizations older than 8000 years, the Chinese, for example, that seem not to have noticed that their land was covered in several thousand meters of water for about a year.
Posted by brill301 2 years ago
Yup, not sure how that happened. I'm not sure how to change it now. Hopefully my opponent will understand or I can figure out how to change it.
Thanks for letting me know.
Posted by NothingSpecial99 2 years ago
It seems that your argument contradicts your stance. You should be Pro
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro ff many times, so conduct to Con.