All Big Issues
The Instigator
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

# Giant human skeletons are real.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1

Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
 Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point Started: 7/22/2016 Category: Miscellaneous Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period Viewed: 748 times Debate No: 94005
Debate Rounds (3)

10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by brontoraptor 2 years ago
The skeletons are real ape. You know they are.
Posted by Stupidape 2 years ago
"Some even coming from the library of congress which actually was the breaking point for me."

Which links came from the library of congress? Brontoraptor posted so many links that I didn't take the time to investigate each one.
Posted by Stupidape 2 years ago
"Besides, what's the difference between a giant T-Rex and a giant human? Con cannot deflect this point. "
Brontoraptor

I've already shown you what the difference would be.

"Giants like Paul Bunyan that stand 20 ft. high would also be impossible because their form would have to be so drastically changed in order to accommodate the increase in size that the person would no longer look human." [8]"

The giant human would have to look so vastly different that he/she wouldn't look human anymore. You have a better chance arguing that a t-rex is human than arguing these giant human looking skeletons are valid.
Posted by Stupidape 2 years ago
"But now he's 64 times the weight he was, at 3 feet, and 16 times the footprint. So 4 times the relative PSI.

"The two maths don't add up. therefore the premise of the square cube law must be flawed." Brontoraptor

Finally got around to reading your round 3. This is nothing wrong with this mathematics. 4x the relative psi is exactly right when comparing 3 feet to 12 feet. Therefore, the cube-square law is correct.

I find often when my opponent is cornered he/she just types a lot of words and hopes nobody notices he/she is wrong.
Posted by brontoraptor 2 years ago
I was less lazy. Vote for me.
Posted by bigotry 2 years ago
While I would, again it was just laziness on both ends that prevents me from voting at all.
Posted by brontoraptor 2 years ago
Vote for me bigotry.
Posted by bigotry 2 years ago
While pro did use digitally altered pictures, after checking out the links he posted, not all of this information was altered and these old news clips are real. Con took no time out to address these specific points or cast doubt on the authenticity of these various news clips. Some even coming from the library of congress which actually was the breaking point for me. Let me be clear though, Pro was lazy and took no time to fact check his sources. Its well known the images of giant skeletons in the ground are altered. Pro really doesn't deserve to win the debate but the content within the links was not specifically addressed so I'm voting for neither. They both deserve to lose for being extremely lazy with their arguments.
Posted by brontoraptor 2 years ago
I'm like a cat.
Posted by Stupidape 2 years ago
Lol, you responded quick going to take some time to read your rebuttal.
No votes have been placed for this debate.