The Instigator
Trollord
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
squonk
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

God Debate Switch-A-Roo 3

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/20/2016 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 357 times Debate No: 89958
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)

 

Trollord

Con

This is on the existense of the christian god.

Con-- Me, I am christian and will argue that god DOESN'T exist.
Pro-- You, you must be atheist and will argue that god DOES exist.

The purpose is that after I calmed my christian bloodlust against atheism in my first month here i got bored of the god debates that take up about one-fifth to one-seventh of our beloved site.

So i want to spice it up a bit.

And the christian god as described in the bible (for standard lets use the KJV) is the god we are arguing about existing.

I have a url for you: http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org......

////////////

VOOOOOOOTERS!!! VOTERS! Hey voters! Please read the rules below as they must be enforced. Thank you!

////////////

Modified Definitions & Rules (MD&R)

--Rules--

1). Con must be christian and argue against god's existence.
2). Pro must be atheist and argue for god's existence.
3). Exception for pro: If you are agnostic i will let you argue pro.
4). When pro or con unless specified uses a word for which i have provided a modified definition for its definition is always the modified definition i have provided.
5). Pro may also create these "modified definitions" but cannot change or make another modified definition for a word i already have done so for. Mine are universal and necessary to be specified for the debate to go smoothly.
6). All modified definitions must be created in the first round.
7). If rules 1, 2, or 3 are not followed it is an automatic loss for the offender.
8). If rules 4, 5, or 6 are not followed the offender is to be voted by all voters as having bad conduct. If BOTH of us break any of them then voters are to vote that we had equal conduct.
9). Disobeying the round specifications is to be punished by the voters by awarding the opponent "convincing arguments".

--Modified Definitions--

God- The christian god as described in the KJV Bible. Is an entity that is thought to possibly exist.

Entity- Something capable of thought.

Thought- The creation of ideas and opinions.

For all definitions not modified refer to here: http://www.merriam-webster.com......

////////////

--Rounds--

Round 1 -- Acceptance/Introduction
Round 2 -- Arguments/Rebuttals
Round 3 -- Arguments/Rebuttals
Round 4 -- Arguments/Rebuttals
Round 5 -- Conclusion/No new arguments or rebuttals

////////////

--For pro:--

You hold BOP.
You must be atheist or agnostic.
You are arguing for god's existence.
Good luck.

////////////

Hello, i am Trollord.

I will be arguing against god's existence.
squonk

Pro

Thank you to my opponent for this brilliant debate idea. I am an atheist, but I will do my best to argue that God exists.
Debate Round No. 1
Trollord

Con

Since you hold BOP your arguments should be posted first.

But,

Preemptive silver bullet:

An immaterial object has no space to process information
so it can't make decisions and thus cannot be a proper entity.

An entity must be capable of thought.
squonk

Pro

Genesis 3:8 says, "And they heard the sound of the LORD God walking in the garden..." Proverbs 15:3 says, "The eyes of the Lord are in every place, keeping watch on the evil and the good.”

God can walk, even though He's an immaterial being (without legs). God can keep watch on everyone at the same time, even though He doesn't literally have eyeballs.

God is a supernatural being. He exists outside of time and space. God is above and beyond the natural world & its natural laws. Therefore, God does not requre a material brain (or any material faculties) in order to process information or make decisions.

What's "impossible" to humans isn't impossible for the LORD.



Debate Round No. 2
Trollord

Con

Ok, evidence.

You still need to prove it somehow.

Nice rebuttal.

It was just to get us talking.
squonk

Pro

squonk forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Trollord

Con

Trollord forfeited this round.
squonk

Pro

squonk forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Trollord

Con

Trollord forfeited this round.
squonk

Pro

squonk forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Trollord 1 year ago
Trollord
That eyeofthebeholder guy's comment on your profile...

I am a little scared...

But i know HTML.

I actually created a website for schools so i don't
need to type usernames or google any stinkin' sites.

I just click.
Posted by Trollord 1 year ago
Trollord
You have.
Posted by MaxLamperouge 1 year ago
MaxLamperouge
Interesting - I think I have seen something like that before.
No votes have been placed for this debate.