The Instigator
Yoriae
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Harold_Lloyd
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

God and creationism true or false

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Harold_Lloyd
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/5/2014 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 546 times Debate No: 66465
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)

 

Yoriae

Pro

I believe in creationism and god not only because he proves himself by not being proven. But god works in ways that enable him to work miracles and answer prayers and talk to people through spirit. God is too amazing and out of this realm to be comprehendid by mankind. We all know what elements are and what elements make put of themselves substances. But do we know who made the element who thought of matter who though of energy who thought of melanin who thought of other significant things that make up the world like the brain. And god created us male nd female and he did it by taking eve out of Adam. Meaning the y chromosome man was here first. There is proof of that. Also two similar cells couldn't change into two different sex cells when they botherdo not know that the other needs the other to procreate
Harold_Lloyd

Con

The question regarding the existence of a deity is beyond the scope of rationality and logic.

When you try to apply the tools of rationality to the question, the result is the equivalent of dividing by zero.

If you persist in that mode, then you have to apply the rule of logic that states that if it cannot be proved true, it must be regarded as false, or untrue.

Since no tangible evidence exists that could logically prove the existence of a god, then the premise is false by default.
Debate Round No. 1
Yoriae

Pro

Yoriae forfeited this round.
Harold_Lloyd

Con

If there were a god, Yoriae should have been inspired to continue the debate.
Debate Round No. 2
Yoriae

Pro

Yoriae forfeited this round.
Harold_Lloyd

Con

I do wish people wouldn't start something they aren't willing to finish.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
a pink dinosaur proves it is always flying above you over an invisible cloud by not being proven, this proves it...

imnotacop perfect answer
Posted by missmedic 2 years ago
missmedic
pro
Logic and reason are absolute because when used in context they do not contradict.
Your statement " he proves himself by not being proven " is a contradictions. Saying "God is too amazing and out of this realm to be comprehendid by mankind." nullifies all remaining points you try to make concerning god.
Posted by imnotacop 2 years ago
imnotacop
As con would I have to say they absolutely don't exist, or just an opposition to the prospect that they do.
In other words, I'd say that I just don't know instead of saying that I know one way or the other as apposed to you saying you know they do.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
YoriaeHarold_LloydTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture