The Instigator
Nimbus328
Pro (for)
Winning
6 Points
The Contender
Controverter
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

God cannot be disproven

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Nimbus328
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/30/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 928 times Debate No: 31892
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

Nimbus328

Pro

Burden of proof is on the person trying to disprove God's existence.

I am defending the Deistic God.
Controverter

Con

As a Deist myself, this will be an interesting stance to take.
Debate Round No. 1
Nimbus328

Pro

God is invisible. You can't prove that he's NOT there, any more than I can prove that he IS there.
Controverter

Con

Actually I can prove that god is not there by throwing powder at the invisible entity and seing that it doesnt make a physical form.
Debate Round No. 2
Nimbus328

Pro

This God is super fast! He evades dection by running!
Controverter

Con

That's impossible.

I have disproven God by logic.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by dont-out-of-line.1 4 years ago
dont-out-of-line.1
Super fast? He's not Flash. /O.O\. Please get facts right. No one can prove hes here or not here.
Posted by rottingroom 4 years ago
rottingroom
What a trap! BOF on the disprover is an oxymoron. BOF is always on the positive claim.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 4 years ago
KingDebater
Nimbus328ControverterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments weren't particularly strong on either side, but the burden of proof was on Con and he didn't fulfil it, so arguments to Pro.
Vote Placed by johnlubba 4 years ago
johnlubba
Nimbus328ControverterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: The resolution is God can not be Dis-proven, Con took this debate even after Pro outlined the BoP is on Con to prove God can not be dis-proven.....This burden was not met by Con.