God can't exist
Debate Rounds (4)
God can't exist. Con must prove God can exist. Pro must prove god can't exist.
First the definition of God: A being that is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, and omnibenevolent.
I will argue based on three points.
1. The Omnipotence Paradox
2. The argument from free will.
3. The argument from quantum mechanics.
The Omnipotence Paradox
This is an example of the Omnipotence Paradox: "can God create a rock so heavy he can't lift it."If God can lift the rock then he's not omnipotent because he can't create a rock so heavy he can't lift it. If God can't lift the rock than he's not omnipotent because his strength is limited. So either way God is not omnipotent.
The Argument From Free Will
If God is omnipotent he is able to create a being with free will. God must also be omniscient in which case he must know what choice that creature with free will will make. This is a paradox because if God know what choice the creature will make, then that creature doesn't have free will; its choice is already determined. If God doesn't know what choice the creature will make, it does have free will, but then God isn't omniscient because there is something he doesn't know. So either way God does not have one of his defining attributes.
The Argument From Quantum Mechanics
This is an argument that I created. It goes like this: God is omniscient meaning that he is observing every particle in the universe. In the double slit experiment an electron was shot at two slits and passed through both because it was a wave and when it hit the detector it became a particle. This is called wave function; the double slit experiment showed that a particle is a wave until it is observed; when it becomes a particle its wave function has collapsed. Now if God is omniscient he MUST be observing every particle in the universe. However if this is true then the electrons in the double slit experiment wouldn't have a wave function since they would have been observed by God; but the electrons did have a wave function. Therefore God cannot be omniscient and has lost one of his defining attributes.
In the first two arguments the defining features of God create a paradox and in the third it shows that God can't be omniscient without completely changing the way the universe acts. Since Gods properties create paradoxes and aren't compatible with the universe I contend that God cannot exist.
*Only for the argument from quantum mechanics
2.Free will-we do have the ability of free will but it seems more likely that he knows all based on what he can observe and infer just like looking at our past and making a guess at what we will do
Con has provided one counter argument: "2.Free will-we do have the ability of free will but it seems more likely that he knows all based on what he can observe and infer just like looking at our past and making a guess at what we will do."
This statement does not support cons claim. Con says that God likely knows all from observation and inference based on our past to make a guess what we will do, however the definition of know is "to be absolutely certain or sure about something." The definition of Omniscient is "all knowing;"which means that an omniscient being must know everything with absolute certainty; no inferences or guesses allowed. So Cons argument is actually going against his case that God can exist.
Bendurisgrate forfeited this round.
Conclusion: God cannot exist.
Sources: Everything above.
Bendurisgrate forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by NightofTheLivingCats 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||4||0|
Reasons for voting decision: FF
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.