The Instigator
invisibledeity
Pro (for)
Losing
15 Points
The Contender
Jonbonbon
Con (against)
Winning
74 Points

God does NOT exist!!!

Do you like this debate?NoYes-42
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 24 votes the winner is...
Jonbonbon
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/11/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 16,103 times Debate No: 45630
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (412)
Votes (24)

 

invisibledeity

Pro

God does not exist!! There is absolutely NO EVIDENCE of any gods existing!!! I am open to the possibility that God exists, but you cannot deny THERE IS NO HARD EVIDENCE!!!

If God DID exist, he would be the most disgusting being imaginable!!!!

Give me HARD EVIDENCE GOD EXISSTS OR ELSE HE DOES NOT!!!
Jonbonbon

Con

My opponent does not has no argument. He has a bunch of baseless assertions. My opponent is making the claim, which means he has the burden of proof, unless otherwise specified. It was not specified that he didn't have the full burden of proof, which means that he has it to the fullest. He has proven literally nothing except that he knows how to use the caps lock button. For this reason it is impossible for my opponent to win, and therefore it is unnecessary for me to provide any arguments against him.
Debate Round No. 1
412 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Jonbonbon 2 years ago
Jonbonbon
I've been feeling pretty great. I've been fairly busy which isn't as fun in my case, but I guess it's a good thing.
Posted by Envisage 2 years ago
Envisage
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein

I have been well, thanks. Increasingly busy with work now, which is a good thing in my case. You?
Posted by Jonbonbon 2 years ago
Jonbonbon
How have you been Envisage?
Posted by Envisage 2 years ago
Envisage
Bump.
Posted by birdlandmemories 2 years ago
birdlandmemories
Pro is in the DDO Dumpster Pile.
Posted by Jonbonbon 2 years ago
Jonbonbon
I'm popular because of this debate. This debate is what makes me who I am.
Posted by Slinky5890 2 years ago
Slinky5890
Oh, I just found it by randomly going through popular people's debates at college.
Posted by Jonbonbon 2 years ago
Jonbonbon
They probably weren't :P I did post a link in that thread about debates you were proud of. It was my most legendary.
Posted by Romanii 2 years ago
Romanii
Well, I posted it in my personal HoF selections just now in the personal forum, but I am skeptical of the idea that they were using that link to get here before I posted it.
Posted by Envisage 2 years ago
Envisage
Bump
24 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by DudeStop 2 years ago
DudeStop
invisibledeityJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:14 
Reasons for voting decision: Negatived Pro's case, and had better grammar. Pro had better conduct. Whupee. I mean what' the point of me "explaining my vote?" All I'm going to do is tell you "this side had better grammar" which is already explained ip by me selecting S/G for Con. Ugh.
Vote Placed by Sagey 2 years ago
Sagey
invisibledeityJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Cons's Assumption that Pro's Assertions are baseless leads me to only one conclusion, Pro's assertion is not baseless, the assertion is the primary reasons for Atheism. If they were baseless, there would be no Atheism. Thus my vote!
Vote Placed by 2-D 2 years ago
2-D
invisibledeityJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro offered no evidence to support his claim. In addition, if I can get real real with you, I'm voting mostly for spite. Pro made no arguments to support an obvious BoP. Arguments to Con. Grammar for obvious errors such as misplaced caps all over the place. Conduct for yelling (all caps) at Con. Pro also made bold claims without offering any sources to back them up. Ironically, I agree with Pro.
Vote Placed by btwinch 2 years ago
btwinch
invisibledeityJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: This wasnt even a debate...
Vote Placed by Kc1999 2 years ago
Kc1999
invisibledeityJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: I have always agreed with InvisibleDeity, but the comments section was so funny I decided to vote (happy JonBonBon?). "Exist" is spelled with one x, and using the CAPS LOCK FOR SOME WORDS ain't gonna get you points. Con had better grammar. No one used sources. Arguments were tied because no sides presented any argument.
Vote Placed by Buckethead31594 2 years ago
Buckethead31594
invisibledeityJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:11 
Reasons for voting decision: "does not has no" = loss of S/G points. Otherwise, a rather pointless debate for all the comments that have been contributed. There were no arguments, so it would be foolish for me to attribute points for convincing arguments.
Vote Placed by jdtroughton 2 years ago
jdtroughton
invisibledeityJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's reasoning holds up, however sparse. Because the deity needs to be suggested by an abstracting consciousness (i.e. you can't study anything natural and objective and find reasons for god), it's on the same footing as werewolves and unicorns: until there is hard evidence, it's intellectually completely sound to say "they don't exist". To say any god is not a similar story is special pleading. Jonbonbon is trying ti lawyer a win, which isn't the spirit of the debate, while IndivisibleDeity deploys his trusty CAPS LOCK as his primary weapon, so conduct is a tie. Of course, the only arguments made were by Pro, and they hold up, so that gives him that point. No sources, so tie sources.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 2 years ago
Krazzy_Player
invisibledeityJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro asks for strong evidence for the existence of God and Con fails to provide any.
Vote Placed by gordonjames 2 years ago
gordonjames
invisibledeityJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had BOP but did not do anything. Pro made claims (evidence based?) about the character of the god he claims does not exist. This is less of a debate and more of a rant.
Vote Placed by TheOncomingStorm 2 years ago
TheOncomingStorm
invisibledeityJonbonbonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: I don't need to repeat what's been said.