The Instigator
imabench
Pro (for)
Tied
23 Points
The Contender
Rational_Thinker9119
Con (against)
Tied
23 Points

God does exist

Do you like this debate?NoYes+4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 10 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/2/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,748 times Debate No: 34455
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (11)
Votes (10)

 

imabench

Pro

In my first ever religious debate I will debate the existence of god and give compelling evidence that shows he does indeed exist

I am for the existence of god, con is against it

2 rounds, 1000 characters, super quick and easy debate
Rational_Thinker9119

Con

I assume first round is for acceptance. Present your case for Theism.
Debate Round No. 1
imabench

Pro

The evidence I have for the existence of God centers entirely on miracles and acts of nature that can only be attributed to an existence of God. These miracles consist of:

1) The band One Direction announcing they plan on splitting up in the future
2) Rebecca Black not making another song since 'Friday'
3) A Chicago Church group apologizing for being so homophobic (http://www.buzzfeed.com...)
4) The Westboro Baptist Church consistently losing members over time
5) M Night Shyamalan NOT making more 'Last Airbender' movies
6) Lebron coming to Miami along with Bosh
7) Me being allowed to make this many troll debates without getting banned
8) Marijuana starting to become legal
9) Salvia already being pretty legal
10) Both the Giants and the Jets missing the playoffs
11) The Yankees not having won a world series since 2009
12) Family Guy still being on the air after being canceled twice

:)
Rational_Thinker9119

Con

The evidence I have against God's existence centers entirely on acts that can only be the result of the non-existence of God:

1) The band One Direction exists
2) Rebecca Black and her song 'Friday' exist
3) There are Homophobic Chicago Church groups
4) The Westboro Baptist Church has members
5) M Night Shyamalan's directs movies
6) Lebron was not in Miami to begin with
7) You are unjustifiably allowed to make troll debates (which means there is no just God!)
8) Marijuana was illegal
9) Salvia was illegal
10) The Giants and the Jets are still in the league
11) The Yankees won a world series
12) Family Guy got canceled

I conclusively proved that there is no God who actually cares about human beings. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 2
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
BTW rebecca made "saturday".....just saying
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
You must be retarded
Posted by missmedic 3 years ago
missmedic
If god exist he drowned his children, and god wants you to beat your to save them, but if they talk back or curse you god wants you to kill them, and god loves you and needs money.
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
Well played rational, well played
Posted by Magic8000 3 years ago
Magic8000
Wow, I actually thought this was going to be a serious debate. I need to study imabench more.
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
Just about anything I do that is only two rounds is meant for sh*ts and giggles...
Posted by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
All two round debates, with first round as acceptance only; are traps.
Posted by Rational_Thinker9119 3 years ago
Rational_Thinker9119
I did not think of that bladerunner060. This could be a troll debate ha
Posted by bladerunner060 3 years ago
bladerunner060
I don't know how yet, but I'm going to assume the Ackbar Position on this debate....
Posted by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
If you think that's a surprise wait til you see the arguments I come up with :P
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by utahjoker 3 years ago
utahjoker
imabenchRational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Counter vote
Vote Placed by gt4o2007 3 years ago
gt4o2007
imabenchRational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Oh you know because I said so
Vote Placed by Greematthew 3 years ago
Greematthew
imabenchRational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:20 
Reasons for voting decision: It was definitely a tie, but Pro had a source lol
Vote Placed by Skeptikitten 3 years ago
Skeptikitten
imabenchRational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:23 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro actually used a source. Con had the more convincing argument that yes, all of imabench's points existing in the first place is more of an argument against a god. At least a just or loving one.
Vote Placed by Gaurdian_Rock 3 years ago
Gaurdian_Rock
imabenchRational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Countering Babyslayer's VB
Vote Placed by Babeslayer 3 years ago
Babeslayer
imabenchRational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Y not lol
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
imabenchRational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to old bency for being funny. He also used a source. Con had the arguments.
Vote Placed by HeartOfGod 3 years ago
HeartOfGod
imabenchRational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: con sufficiently countered every one of pros arguments. Nothing much else to see..
Vote Placed by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
imabenchRational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's counters were weak. I mean, they were weak. "M. Night Shamamalala stopped making Last Airbending Movies" "BUT HE MAKES MOVIES" and that was essentially every counter by Con. Well played, Ima. I almost thought you were going to be serious.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 3 years ago
bladerunner060
imabenchRational_Thinker9119Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:23 
Reasons for voting decision: Con rebutted all of Pro's otherwise hilarious points. But Pro used a source! In the end, though, the Ackbar Position proved correct.