The Instigator
Debate_King1475
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
dsjpk5
Con (against)
Winning
19 Points

God does not exist

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
dsjpk5
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/15/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 425 times Debate No: 65199
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

Debate_King1475

Pro

There are many reasons why there is no God but here are a few. The first reason is that if a supernatural cause created the universe then there would need to be supernatural evidence. The second reason is that God has no reason to create the universe. The third reason is that God did not create a perfect universe or a perfect world and yet he is supposed to be supernatural and perfect. The fourth reason is that no one could create a supernatural being. The last reason is that he cannot be seen.
dsjpk5

Con

As my opponent is the instigator, and has taken the pro position. He has the full burden of proof.
Since he has limited this to 500 characters, my responses will be short.

Contention 1: It's impossible to prove anything doesn't exist. Anything can exist, so my opponent has an impossible task. He cannot meet his burden of proof.

God didn't need to create, but He did. Maybe we cannot detect supernatural evidence since we are natural beings. Maybe He was never created. Maybe He's invisible.
Debate Round No. 1
Debate_King1475

Pro

Debate_King1475 forfeited this round.
dsjpk5

Con

My opponent has forfeited this round. I ask the voters to remember this when voting on conduct. I extend all arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
Debate_King1475

Pro

Debate_King1475 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Debate_King1475

Pro

Debate_King1475 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Debate_King1475

Pro

Debate_King1475 forfeited this round.
dsjpk5

Con

In conclusion, my opponent has forfeited several rounds and had the full burden of proof since he was the instigator and took the Pro position. I did not have to prove there is a God. I just had to negate his claims. I did that, so the resolution is negated. I have won. Please vvote Con.
Debate Round No. 5
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by dsjpk5 2 years ago
dsjpk5
Let me know if you want a rematch!
Posted by Duncan 2 years ago
Duncan
People like you give atheists a bad reputation.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Tweka 2 years ago
Tweka
Debate_King1475dsjpk5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
Debate_King1475dsjpk5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by Theunkown 2 years ago
Theunkown
Debate_King1475dsjpk5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Due to forfeiture, all points to Con.
Vote Placed by RevNge 2 years ago
RevNge
Debate_King1475dsjpk5Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con due to the FF of Pro, but no other points as both sides have made weak and insubstantial arguments.