The Instigator
Illegalcombatant
Pro (for)
Winning
18 Points
The Contender
Brainmaster
Con (against)
Losing
4 Points

God exists (joke debate)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Illegalcombatant
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/13/2011 Category: Religion
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,775 times Debate No: 17031
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (7)
Votes (5)

 

Illegalcombatant

Pro

Joke Debate, who ever gets the most lols out of you gets your vote.

Pro will argue that God exists
Con will seek to negate and/or argue that God does not exist.

Video allowed, no more than 3 mins per round.

Opening Arguments.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I present arguably the greatest theologian of the 21st and maybe 13th century "Father" Bill O Reilly. (Watch video now)

Let me break down this proof of Gods existence for you atheist pinheads.

1) Sun exists, moon exists, Venus doesn't have a moon
2) You can't explain that
3) Therefore God exists.

1) Tide goes in, tide goes out
2) You can't explain that
3) Therefore God exists

1) Tide goes in, tide goes out
2) You can't explain that (ok well you can explain that with the moon but where did the moon come from ?)
3) Therefore God exists

1) It takes more faith to not believe than to believe
2) Therefore God exists

CHECK & MATE you atheist pinheads.
Brainmaster

Con

I thanks the foolish sheep Illegalcombatant for providing this opportunity to debate.

Rebuttal__

Now my opponent ignores completely the lack of proof for God. It does not take a rocket scientist to see his error.

One major flaw in the God argument is evolution. I propose this:The universe and all laws of physics were organized randomly, after which everything came to precisely what is needed for life, at which point humans must have emerged. The existence of God is just too unlikely to contemplate.

Now I present you an example: If a tornado blew through a junkyard, would it not assemble a Boeing 747 in under 5 minutes? Of course it would, because if God existed he would prevent Satan's attacks from showing any real power.

Back to you PRO.
Debate Round No. 1
Illegalcombatant

Pro

I thank the pinhead for their reply.

The atheist brings up their religion of evolution, but this false religion is very easy shown false as well known biologist Kirk Cameron explains (Watch video now)

Where is Croc O duck ? You can't explain that.

Now listen up you atheist pin heads and you might learn something.....

TIDE GOES IN, TIDE GOES OUT
TIDE GOES IN, TIDE GOES OUT
TIDE GOES IN, TIDE GOES OUT
TIDE GOES IN, TIDE GOES OUT

NEVER A MISCOMMUNICATION !!!

Vote Pro.
Brainmaster

Con

Tide goes in because of the moon, which God did not create and certainly arranged by itself.

If God exists, would He have allowed this?

Of course not!!!!

Now obviously there is no God because Richard Dawkins said so, who also said he is right, meaning he is right.

For the reasons, vote CON or be a d!ckhead.
Debate Round No. 2
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Illegalcombatant 6 years ago
Illegalcombatant
Yeah but where did those two moons come from ? Who put them there ? You can't explain that.
Posted by feverish 6 years ago
feverish
Someone should let Bill know that Mars actually has two moons.
Posted by Brainmaster 6 years ago
Brainmaster
My logic is terrible and revolves around my own terrible logic.

Vote con

Also it's funny we are debating against are actual viewpoints
Posted by headphonegut 6 years ago
headphonegut
Lol cliff stamp wins just sayin
Posted by Cliff.Stamp 6 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
"you can't explain it, where did the moon come from cliff"

That is self-evident. The mood is actually a proto-dyson sphere built by the Proxiods which are the slave race of the Reptoids. It is often mistaken to be built by the Greys but that is simply ridiculous as they do not have the technology most likely as they do not have access to the consciousness expanding properties of monoatomic gold. I don't see why that would cause anyone any issues, it is pretty obvious to me.
Posted by Illegalcombatant 6 years ago
Illegalcombatant
See Cliff, this is the problem with atheist terrorist loving liberals like your self, you can't explain it, where did the moon come from cliff ? huh ? well ? see you can't explain that, so all you do is mock.
Posted by Cliff.Stamp 6 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
The sad part is this isn't a joke, it is a real argument.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by feverish 6 years ago
feverish
IllegalcombatantBrainmasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was funnier
Vote Placed by izbo10 6 years ago
izbo10
IllegalcombatantBrainmasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: pro was funnier though he stole most of the jokes.
Vote Placed by Ore_Ele 6 years ago
Ore_Ele
IllegalcombatantBrainmasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Okay, the Neon cat convinced me for Con. While I felt the "pinhead" was in jest, the "dickhead" didn't seem to have the same lightness to it. 1:3
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 6 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
IllegalcombatantBrainmasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: IC takes this in spades, Con you had to go deadpan or full retard, you can't play it down the middle. 3:1 Pro
Vote Placed by OMGJustinBieber 6 years ago
OMGJustinBieber
IllegalcombatantBrainmasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had such a difficult hill to climb after Pro invoked O'Reilly and then later Cameron, although Nyan Cat was a solid closing.