The Instigator
qopel
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
Ozat
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

God exists

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
qopel
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/24/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,037 times Debate No: 31659
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (31)
Votes (1)

 

qopel

Con

The burden of proof is on those who make the positive claim (pro).
Ozat

Pro

I am sure that God exists. The existence of God cannot be proved by scientific experimentation. It is purely a question of faith and refers to the intuitive side of man. People should understand that universe is created by someone and now it is controlled by someone, otherwise there going to be a chaos.
Debate Round No. 1
qopel

Con

The existence of God is possible, but has not been proved. My opponent admits that "God cannot be proved by scientific experimentation".

Faith is not proof. Faith is an excuse to believe something without evidence.

My opponent wants to assert, without evidence, that the "universe is created by someone and now it is controlled by someone, otherwise there going to be a chaos"

According to the Big Bang theory, the Universe came into existence on it's own. To quote Stephen Hawking, "It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going."

There is also no evidence that can prove that God controls anything that happens. Forces, such as gravity help provide order and avoid chaos".

My opponent has not been able to prove there is a God and admits it is impossible to do so. My opponent has not met his burden of proof.
Ozat

Pro

Ozat forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
qopel

Con

Oh no. Another Theist forfeit? Seriously? This is getting ridiculous.
Voters, please don't give me votes because of the forfeit. Give me votes on the actual debate.
Thanks!
Ozat

Pro

Ozat forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
31 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by wolfman4711 3 years ago
wolfman4711
Qopel ill debate u anytime
Posted by qopel 3 years ago
qopel
Smith: You really expect me to unblock and debate you now?
Posted by Smithereens 3 years ago
Smithereens
I have posted evidence of votebombing by qopel here: http://www.debate.org...
Lets hope thats ended now. qopel hasn't vb recently
Posted by Nur-Ab-Sal 3 years ago
Nur-Ab-Sal
I specifically mentioned my debate with devient.genie in the thread, qopel.
Posted by qopel 3 years ago
qopel
Accuse me all you want. Where's the evidence?
Posted by Nur-Ab-Sal 3 years ago
Nur-Ab-Sal
lol, qopel.
Posted by Smithereens 3 years ago
Smithereens
Btw, you have been accused as a votebomber here: http://www.debate.org...
Posted by qopel 3 years ago
qopel
Just look at all my debates and you'll see plenty of vote bombs.
Posted by Smithereens 3 years ago
Smithereens
yes, I am compiling a case against him to ask the DDO president to revoke his voting privilege. Is there any evidence you know of that I would probably miss?
Posted by qopel 3 years ago
qopel
a vote bomber?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
qopelOzatTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit.