The Instigator
Fanath
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points
The Contender
FrankTheBob
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

God exists

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Fanath
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/6/2014 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 449 times Debate No: 56175
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

Fanath

Con

Resolution: God exists

In this debate, we will use the Christian God.

Rounds:

Con

(1) Rules
(2) Contentions
(3) Contentions/rebuttals
(4) Rebuttals/Closing Statements

Pro

(1) Contentions
(2) Contentions/Rebuttals
(3) Closing statements
(4) Shall type only "no round as agreed upon" and nothing else

Rules

(1) If my opponent fails to type "No round as agreed upon" in the last round will lead to a full 7 point FF. If my opponent types any other words besides "No round as agreed upon" in the last round, he or she will FF the entire debate with a 7 point loss.
(2) 10k character limits.
(3) No semantics or trolling/ this will result in a ff.
(4) Plagiarizing results in a FF.
(5) The rules, structure, and definitions of the debate cannot be negotiated or changed once the debate has started.
(6) It is accepted that the BOP in this debate is on Pro.

Thanks.
FrankTheBob

Pro

Why did I click the button. I didn't have to click the button. I clicked the button because I was all like "...but believeing in a god is dumb" but then I remembered after I clicked that everyone shold be able to be happy with their religion and I don't really care about this topic. Weather someone believes in a god or not won't affect me one bit. I'd rather debate about real issues that affect me, but I'm the idiot for clicking accept. What have I done? *sigh*

The truth is that I can't prove that a god doesn't exist just like you can't prove that my magical invisble flying pet hippo doesn't exist. Don't use the Bible a s a base for your arguement and don't say that I just can't exept someone over me.

This is my arguement for the rest of the debate.
I'm not a troll.

*drops microphone*

https://www.youtube.com...
Debate Round No. 1
Fanath

Con

I believe my opponent is confused. He is supposed to be for the resolution, not against. Anyway:

P1. God is supposedly omnipotent, pure, and omniscient.
P2. If god was pure, he would want to destroy all evil.
P3. If god was omniscient, he could find evil.
P4. If god was omnipotent, god could destroy all evil.
P5. Evil exists
C. Therefor, god does not exist.
FrankTheBob

Pro

FrankTheBob forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Fanath

Con

Waiting on Pro to make a contention.
FrankTheBob

Pro

FrankTheBob forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Fanath

Con

Still waiting.
FrankTheBob

Pro

FrankTheBob forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Sagey 2 years ago
Sagey
Odd games on DDO
Posted by Romanii 2 years ago
Romanii
You FFed our debate and started a new one just like it...
Posted by Fanath 2 years ago
Fanath
What?
Posted by Romanii 2 years ago
Romanii
REALLY!? -__- nac
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Themba 2 years ago
Themba
FanathFrankTheBobTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: WHAT HAVE I DONE, I shouldn't be reading this debate, I shouldn't even be here. Pro! Wait for me!! |Conduct-FF Arguments were uncontested.
Vote Placed by Sagey 2 years ago
Sagey
FanathFrankTheBobTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro sort of agrees with Con and Con gets the conduct point as Pro dropped the microphone, probably landed on his foot. Ouch! :-D~