God (if real) can exist with no beginning nor end
Debate Rounds (4)
(a) oppose my argument
(b) no copying/pasting or trolling
Good luck, Con.
Here's the thing: who created the universe? The Big Bang? Well, what caused the Big Bang if nothing was there? Better yet, what created the source that created the Big Bang? Obviously, the questions will keep on going and going until there's no tomorrow.
If god is real, then he has no beginning nor end just like the Bible predicts. Why? Because he's the creator of not just the universe, but time as well. Space and time are something we exist in. We see things in motion and the days passing by with the universe in order and unimaginable complexity that seem to overcome the assumption that the universe was made by chance alone. God, on the other hand, exists outside the realm. Space & time are his creation, not the universe. The universe doesn't own god and neither does logic in any other arguments from atheists.
Atheists love to point out that he is some invisible flying spaghetti monster that lives in the sky or somewhere else. Well, how can such invisible flying spaghetti monster exist if there's no space nor time? Exactly. There needs to be a necessity self-made source and that's exactly what the Bible means by having no beginning nor end.
Of course, you don't need to believe in the Bible in order to accept his existence. The logic makes sense if you think about it regardless if you're religious or not.
If God is a constant then evidence that can be observed must be presented. No, I can't disprove it. But it is impossible, and illogical, to disprove something that has not been proven.
Although this is not my responsibility, I have a quote from a website that talks about evidence of possible origins of the universe
"In 1982, Alexander Vilenkin proposed an extension of Tyron's idea and suggested that the Universe was created by quantum processes starting from "literally nothing", meaning not only the absence of matter, but the absence of space and time as well. Vilenkin took the idea of quantum tunneling and proposed that the Universe started in the totally empty geometry and then made a quantum tunneling transition to a non-empty state (subatomic in size), which through inflation (the Universe expands exponentially fast for a brief period of time which causes its size to increase dramatically) came to its current size.
Another idea is from Stephen Hawking and James Hartle. Hawking proposed a description of the Universe in its entirety, viewed as a self-contained entity, with no reference to anything that might have come before it. The description is timeless, in the sense that one set of equations delineates the Universe for all time. As one looks to earlier and earlier times, one finds that the model Universe is not eternal, but there is no creation event either. Instead, at times of the order of 10-43 seconds, the approximation of a classical description of space and time breaks down completely, with the whole picture dissolving into quantum ambiguity. In Hawking's words, the Universe "would neither be created nor destroyed. It would just BE"
Please refer to the website for more information (http://curious.astro.cornell.edu...)
Musibrique forfeited this round.
Musibrique forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.