God is not real
Debate Rounds (3)
The question before us today is whether or not God exists; And to that effect the naysayer has offered one piece of evidence, to whit 'The Bible is rationally unbelievable'.
In weighing the pro's and con's we participate in rational enquiry and with insufficient evidence to the contrary we grant "The benefit of the doubt" to the contender, which in effect supports a premise that God does in fact exist.
(bows) Good-day (bows)
Please save your flowers.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by ssadi 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: The resolution was a fact-claim that God "is not" real. Therefore, BoP was heavily on Pro to prove this claim.. Pro barely asserts that Bible has contradictions etc. and doesn't even sufficiently explain how that would affirm the resolution even if it was true. Other than this none provided any argument to affirm or negate the resolution. Since BoP on Pro was heavier to prove the fact claim they made and since they didn't provide any convincing argument, I vote for Con for arguments.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.