The Instigator
eyeballsac
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
jesusfreak22
Con (against)
Winning
15 Points

God is not real

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
jesusfreak22
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/21/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 815 times Debate No: 41023
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (11)
Votes (3)

 

eyeballsac

Pro

I don't believe in God, and am against religion in most ways. I challenge you to a debate as to whether or not god exists.
jesusfreak22

Con

I accept. :)
Debate Round No. 1
eyeballsac

Pro

In my opinion, I obviously don't believe in a God, otherwise I wouldn't be making this argument. One thing I think about is the fact that so many religions bash homosexuality. If your supposed god and jesus "love everyone", wouldn't that mean that a vast majority of these churches are sinning?
jesusfreak22

Con

One thing I think about is the fact that so many religions bash homosexuality. If your supposed god and jesus "love everyone", wouldn't that mean that a vast majority of these churches are sinning?

It is true that many religions and churchs are not as friendly to some people as they should be. But all I can say to that is that none of that is God's fault. That is the fault of the people in the church. We are all created equally and should be treated so.
To quote what my youth minister said the other day (ironic that he said this too with you saying this lol)"If we look at anyone who walks through these doors with distain, whether they are homosexuals, drug addicts, drug dealers, whatever! If we look at any one of them with scorn, shame on us. Because we have no right to judge. We are imperfect too." You also said that the churchs are sinning when they "bash" people. Yes, people in the church sin. That's because we're human... we ALL SIN!
Romans 3:23--- For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.


I would like to move onto my points now. God has proven his existance with the bible. The bible has been scientifically proven to be true.
The Bible talks in Exodus about how, with the help of God, Moses parts the Red Sea so that God's chosen people may walk across on dry land. The God closes the sea, trapping the murderers and their horses. This has been proven with evidence found IN the Red Sea.
http://www.wnd.com...

Not long ago most scientists considered it ridiculous to believe that God
actually created our world. Many still feel that way today. But while the
majority of evidence at one time appeared to favor evolution, this is no longer
the case. A growing list of scientists believe that special creation offers a
more consistent explanation of the scientific evidence than the theory of
evolution. New findings, as well as a re-evaluation of older data, are often
putting evolutionists on the defensive. Many are beginning to see how much faith
is really necessary to accept the evolutionary theory of origins. (This comes STRAIGHT from mcdonaldroad.org)


Debate Round No. 2
eyeballsac

Pro

eyeballsac forfeited this round.
jesusfreak22

Con

My previous arguments stand.
I would also like to introduce this video. ;
Debate Round No. 3
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Bolizen 3 years ago
Bolizen
" One cannot prove something doesn't exist, it is therefore invalid to say "God is not real" "

I quote you, SavedByChrist94.

If one cannot prove something doesn't exist, then I could say fluffy bunnies made the world. I could say anything I want, and you would not be able to disprove me.

This is why if you say God exists, then YOU must prove it.
Posted by SavedByChrist94 3 years ago
SavedByChrist94
Also yes Bible has been proven to be Scientifically true, www.youtube.com/watch?v=59xaHJjLfzQ
Posted by SavedByChrist94 3 years ago
SavedByChrist94
One cannot prove something doesn't exist, it is therefore invalid to say "God is not real"
Posted by jesusfreak22 3 years ago
jesusfreak22
I believe I posted a few in my arguement, as well as one in my previous comment.
Posted by Bolizen 3 years ago
Bolizen
"The bible has been scientifically proven to be true. "

Are you sure? Can you please post your source?
Posted by jesusfreak22 3 years ago
jesusfreak22
I believe in God because he is there. There is proof that he existed and that he created the world. I hope that one day you will see that. I'm not trying to force my relion upon anyone, I'm merely expressing my opinion.
As for Noah's Ark... http://www.viewzone.com...
Posted by emil1 3 years ago
emil1
I would like to say to eyeball sac: "Where is the proof that God doesn't exist?"
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
The bible, in fact DOES contain some historical truths. Yet that does not mean everything inside of the bible is true. There are truths in other religions, yet this only means they have included a little bit of facts. We are all atheist. I just believe in one less god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss the hundreds of the other gods, you'll understand why dismiss yours. (And how do you scientifically prove Noah's Ark?)
Posted by jesusfreak22 3 years ago
jesusfreak22
Thanks for the support! :)
Posted by Soulja_n 3 years ago
Soulja_n
jesusfreak22, go head and tell it JESUS IS REAL
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
eyeballsacjesusfreak22Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by TeaPartyAtheist 3 years ago
TeaPartyAtheist
eyeballsacjesusfreak22Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeits and elaboration of arguments
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
eyeballsacjesusfreak22Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to con because of the forfeit. Arguments and sources also to con because cons argument was more into detail, and backed by sources.