The Instigator
LifeMeansGodIsGood
Pro (for)
Winning
31 Points
The Contender
POPOO5560
Con (against)
Losing
16 Points

God loves you...4

Do you like this debate?NoYes-7
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 17 votes the winner is...
LifeMeansGodIsGood
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/22/2014 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 4,483 times Debate No: 59396
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (141)
Votes (17)

 

LifeMeansGodIsGood

Pro

God loves you and wants you to have eternal life in heaven. He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Repent, and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved. God does not want you to burn in Hell; He loves you.
POPOO5560

Con

LifeMeansGodIsGood do you still remember me ? :D

Ok here simply request prove to all of us that your claims more truthful than the the flying spaghetti monster and i will become a christain tonight! no wasting time... dont write without evidence... if you have one smash it on me
Debate Round No. 1
LifeMeansGodIsGood

Pro

God loves you, He gives you air to breathe.
POPOO5560

Con

until you give some evidence for christainity, the flying spaghetti monster makes more sense than your faith.

flying spaghetti monster loves you! haleloya!!
Debate Round No. 2
LifeMeansGodIsGood

Pro

This isn't about the flying spaghetti monster. God loves you. The air you breathe is evidence. Are you going to debate or not? Are you ignoring the fact that God gives you air to breathe? Comeon, put up an argument please.
POPOO5560

Con

In the Talmot they cursing Jesus you know... so you saying that God loves them too? Whats the debate about anyway...
Debate Round No. 3
141 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Sooner 1 year ago
Sooner
Ignore them Life. Trolls piled upon trolls piled upon trolls. They know nothing of the madness behind Islam nor do they study Quantum Physics. Jesus is the Son of God. Plain and simple. You are on the narrow path. Stsy on it and ignore those wandering around on the paths of destruction.
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 2 years ago
LifeMeansGodIsGood
you need to prove it and be sure you are not caught dead wrong. I know you are wrong, but you talk like you are speaking facts which you can prove, so you better prove it before it's too late and you find out you are lost forever.
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 2 years ago
LifeMeansGodIsGood
prove it
Posted by YaHey 2 years ago
YaHey
The driving force behind your mind, and everything that makes a person themselves, ends at death. The physical components of one's body remains to decompose. Just like a computer can function, but you pull the plug it dies. The shell remains, but the driving force behind the computer has died.
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 2 years ago
LifeMeansGodIsGood
why trash yourself like that?
Posted by Firelife 2 years ago
Firelife
Life means litteraly nothing
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 2 years ago
LifeMeansGodIsGood
Funny stuff in this debate.......My opponent used the same arguments so many of you have voted in support of based on your own biases against me and God and the Bible and Jesus Christ, but my opponent in this debate spoke with an accent (I believe it's Arablic) and his thought processes were to simplify the arguments of atheists which are so often supported againt me no matter how irrational they are, Those arguments really are so chilishly simple that my opponent here oversimplified them to the point of being completely missed by the voters.
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 2 years ago
LifeMeansGodIsGood
Very well said, Adam.
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 2 years ago
LifeMeansGodIsGood
I wil refute your statement that when we die, we simply cease existing.
I find this contradictory to the I think therefore I am philosophy. You think and so you exist. How can somehing which exists simply not exist? Existence cannot become non existence because existence's only quality is to exist. What sort of hidden force or power is simply making things that exist not to exist? Certainly things can change form and design but existence will always exist. If one day you could be non existent then you wouldnt exist in the first place. Existence only changes form but it doesnt make sense for existence to suddenly be able to not exist. It wouldnt have to exist in the first place then.

Anyway, that's what I believe. Of course I can't prove this but it's my own opinion.
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 2 years ago
LifeMeansGodIsGood
Good common sense logic here, Adam.......Kudos to you on this, i will use this kind of argument when dealing with atheists, Hindus, Buddists, and existentialists. Very well said.
17 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by YamaVonKarma 2 years ago
YamaVonKarma
LifeMeansGodIsGoodPOPOO5560Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: This is not how a debate works. Go home, you're both drunk.
Vote Placed by rings48 2 years ago
rings48
LifeMeansGodIsGoodPOPOO5560Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's argument is..... well short..... But Con just joked around so Pro wins
Vote Placed by Envisage 2 years ago
Envisage
LifeMeansGodIsGoodPOPOO5560Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: No arguments made... Contuct to pro for Con trolling.
Vote Placed by LDPOFODebATeR0328 2 years ago
LDPOFODebATeR0328
LifeMeansGodIsGoodPOPOO5560Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro actually attempted to debate.
Vote Placed by Adam_Godzilla 2 years ago
Adam_Godzilla
LifeMeansGodIsGoodPOPOO5560Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments are equally valid. Conduct equal, both tried to debate and argue. Con had no sources but pro provided evidence to which con failed to rebut. Pro wins but only for this debate. I wonder if pro can win our debate as well which follows the same subject.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
LifeMeansGodIsGoodPOPOO5560Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Argument is quite clearly tied, con was off topic, but pro refused to support his claim mostly repeating the subject line instead (were the air people breath implied to in any way be provided by God, that would have become more than an empty assertion thus winning the debate). S&G: Neither side distracted much from their weak cases.
Vote Placed by doomswatter 2 years ago
doomswatter
LifeMeansGodIsGoodPOPOO5560Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: I'm afraid I have to give this one to Pro. He presented at least one argument, no matter how well-supported it wasn't, and Con did not contest or rebut it. In official terminology, this would render the argument "dropped" by Con. Pro's one argument vs. Con's zero arguments means Pro wins. Pro also takes conduct because Con was derisive ("flying spaghetti monster loves you! haleloya!!) and asked what the debate was about in the final round. By the way, I have reported all 7-point vote bombs on both sides. Poor votes don't make this site any better than sham debates do. (The only reason I voted on such a sham debate was because I felt that those voting for Con were being unfair)
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 2 years ago
birdlandmemories
LifeMeansGodIsGoodPOPOO5560Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con argued nothing. The Fliying spaghetti Monster has to be some sort of joke. Pro at least put out arguments (bad ones), but con tries to joke around and put forth the silliest of theories.
Vote Placed by CentristX 2 years ago
CentristX
LifeMeansGodIsGoodPOPOO5560Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:20 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct goes to Pro because Con made rude comments, atheist or not, grammar also goes to Pro
Vote Placed by johnlubba 2 years ago
johnlubba
LifeMeansGodIsGoodPOPOO5560Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Although Pro made only assertions, Con did not negate them, so the arguments that God loves you and gives you air to breathe, stands. Regardless of Pro fulfilling his Bop the arguments still stands as it is not up to the voter to negate the argument but the contender, It is Cons burden to negate any argument Pro puts forward, And that he didn't do.