The Instigator
SubjectiveMorality
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
Lazarius
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

God most likely does NOT exist (2nd Copy)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
SubjectiveMorality
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/24/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 386 times Debate No: 41147
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

SubjectiveMorality

Pro

R1) Acceptance (Only)
R2) Presentations
R3) Rebuttals
R4) Arguments
R5) Conclusion
Lazarius

Con

I accept, and look forward to your arguments.
Debate Round No. 1
SubjectiveMorality

Pro

I simply do NOT hold the belief that a monotheistic, omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent God exists until proportional evidence is presented. For instance, there is a box. We haven't opened the box yet. So we have no sufficient justification to prove the claim that it contains anything.

REMEMBER:
1) Presentations
2) Rebuttals

He definitely exists in the faith of individuals, though.

Nonetheless, it is possible. It is just most unlikely.

Also:
1) "Christians believe their God is omniscient and knows everything, including everything that has happened and will happen, as well as every thought your mind creates before you think it. If that's the case, there is no "free will.""

2) "They also believe their God is omnipotent, and can do anything. Problem is, if their God can do anything but doesn't lift a finger to stop all the disasters, massacres and wars that have happened, are happening now and will happen in the future, their God is also a psychopath who enjoys watching our misery."

I have derived these from my Atheist friend. He is no longer a Deist (Belief in a God who does not intervene).
Lazarius

Con

Correct. I can not present evidence proportional to the claim. I take it upon faith. Simple.
Debate Round No. 2
SubjectiveMorality

Pro

If you took the CON/Against position, you would present evidence proportional to your claim that a monotheistic, omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God exists. So therefore, you may concede that you have already lost the debate.

Also,

"You accepted this debate to tell me I'm correct?"
MikeNH
Lazarius

Con

Lazarius forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by MikeNH 3 years ago
MikeNH
""You accepted this debate to tell me I'm correct?"
MikeNH"

Hey look I'm famous.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by MikeNH 3 years ago
MikeNH
SubjectiveMoralityLazariusTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con presented no arguments and forfeited. No contest.