The Instigator
Lotbing
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
vwv
Con (against)
Winning
2 Points

God

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
vwv
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/11/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 825 times Debate No: 63101
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (21)
Votes (2)

 

Lotbing

Pro

Disprove God.

Yes, you can. You just have to find something that goes against the existence of God.
vwv

Con

Which god is it that you will be defending?
Debate Round No. 1
Lotbing

Pro

A creator in general.
vwv

Con

Creator of what?

What is the creator?

Define this creator's physique.
Debate Round No. 2
Lotbing

Pro

The type of the creator in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
vwv

Con

The creator in Judaism conradicts the other 2, so on and so forth.

If you would liek me to show you the conflicts in the moral codes of Allah, God(father)/Yahweh/Holy-Ghost (Christian) and God (Jewish), I'd be happy to show you.

Only one of those three can be real, so pick which one.
Debate Round No. 3
Lotbing

Pro

I wasn't talking about that they were the same God, I was talking about the quallities they have.

I'll pick the one in Judaism/Christianity.

Begin!
vwv

Con

My argument is that they don't exist because Allah does.
Debate Round No. 4
Lotbing

Pro

Lotbing forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
21 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Lotbing 1 year ago
Lotbing
Except I changed my mind and think it is impossible to disprove God, because 1) We are too limited in terms of knowledge and 2) God is 100% proven.
Posted by Lotbing 1 year ago
Lotbing
The argument below contradicts the definition of omnipotent. If someone were omnipotent they would transcend the laws of logic and thus be able to do things that we as limited humans cannot comprehend, like making a rock too heavy to lift and then lifting it.
Posted by Neoman 2 years ago
Neoman
1) God can do anything.
2) God can make an unliftable mountain (because of fact 1).
3) God can lift anything (because of fact 1 makes fact 2 false and therefore fact 1 also false)
4) God cannot lift the mountain. (makes fact 2 true and fact 3 false therefore fact 1 false)

You are welcome.
Posted by Linkish1O2 2 years ago
Linkish1O2
Please tell me how this is a debate? There is no arguments and no contradictions. This is ridiculous and shall be reported.
Posted by cheyennebodie 2 years ago
cheyennebodie
There are many gods. El Shaddai says not to have any other gods before him. El Shaddai means the " supreme one" .It also means provider of life and all that accompanies it.You can make money your god. Government is god to a lot of people today.Philosophy is other peoples god.Atheism is god to some folks. Whatever provides your reason and purpose in life is your god. The reason El Shaddai wants to be your God is because he can back up his provision.Trusting in money can bring you to a place where you will fall short of your need. Terminal cancer is one. Or government. Or atheism.But God and his promises can supply all your needs according to what he has supplied in his world. Which is wealthier beyond out fondest dreams.

Jesus walked in those promises and fed 5000 with just a box lunch.He reached into the unseen world with faith , and brought forth provision for the folks.
Posted by Andrebigplay69 2 years ago
Andrebigplay69
God is eternal
Posted by vwv 2 years ago
vwv
then what made god.
Posted by Andrebigplay69 2 years ago
Andrebigplay69
If god doesn't exist would you be here? For us to be alive someone would have to make us and that is God
Posted by Randomguy69 2 years ago
Randomguy69
You take sarcastic comments so seriously lol
Posted by vwv 2 years ago
vwv
Ah, so you wish the impossible... Right.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
LotbingvwvTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: ff, con offers no justification for allah's existence but pro also does nothing.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
LotbingvwvTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture