The Instigator
Max.Wallace
Pro (for)
Losing
4 Points
The Contender
wolf24
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points

Goodbye DDO. You poor teeny bopper fools.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
wolf24
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/16/2014 Category: Health
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 685 times Debate No: 61824
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (11)
Votes (4)

 

Max.Wallace

Pro

All the debaters here are a bunch of children, indoctrinated with the system that brings those to power. Good bye DDO.
wolf24

Con

I accept. Good luck!
Debate Round No. 1
Max.Wallace

Pro

Good luck to what? Your retort doesn't exist yet so how can I lose? 3 voters or less will decide my fate here, no doubt in my mind.
wolf24

Con

wolf24 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Max.Wallace

Pro

Thanks for something, but it may be nothing. Let all .000000001% of the voters decide our fate.
wolf24

Con

wolf24 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
Ben Franklin was a nice man wishing we would all be Turkeys.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
The comment that mad you irate was focused at the talk amongst ourselves crowd and the banners.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
I love you man! Although only your picture is a manly image, the rest is left to the imagination. You are endowed with banning power? Is that something you have coveted and here is where you have it? Logic is everyones emotions. We are all logical, and lunatics. Ban me if that is your wish. Thanks for the love human.
Posted by LogicalLunatic 2 years ago
LogicalLunatic
If you want to be banned, attack me here and now. Hold nothing back.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
Sorry, I am an addict, I just cannot leave till they boot me out. I will keep trying to quit though, like all addicts. Read my other debates.
Posted by RulerOfNone 2 years ago
RulerOfNone
Well....bye.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
resolution is created by the votes of the majority. There is never a real resolution here.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
OK, what was all the yessing about? Don't stab yourself in the eye please.
Posted by LogicalLunatic 2 years ago
LogicalLunatic
Yes! YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! at long last!
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
Debating a quitter is like stabbing yourself in the eye. Eagles, or any bird brains, never quit. You?
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by YYW 2 years ago
YYW
Max.Wallacewolf24Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: It is astonishing to me that people even make debates like this. Even though he FF'd, conduct to CON because of PRO's generally being rude. This was a positive resolution, which means that PRO holds the full BOP. He must prove that DDO is opposed of "poor teeny bopper fools." PRO failed to define what a 'teeny bopper fool' is, as surely as he failed to prove his claim. Default win to CON because PRO failed to define or sustain his BOP. Sources to CON because PRO failed to use sufficient information to sustain his claim.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
Max.Wallacewolf24Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con Forfeited
Vote Placed by Relativist 2 years ago
Relativist
Max.Wallacewolf24Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's mind did made my mind up. 0 points. Sure, your theory is sound
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 2 years ago
bladerunner060
Max.Wallacewolf24Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: I'm nulling this vote. Despite Con's forfeits, this was never an actual deabte--there was no real resolution here, and Pro presented nothing despite instigating. Was his purpose to "win" and take that as reason to "stay"? I don't know--but I do know that, given what nonsense this was, I can't even (and I usually DO) fault Con for the forfeits. That's saying something.