The Instigator
pornstar666
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
jdean1
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

Government funding for hookers

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
jdean1
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/3/2014 Category: People
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 463 times Debate No: 55963
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

pornstar666

Pro

It is in my personal opinion that the U.S government should provide funding for hookers. Because let us be honest, they use hookers more than anyone else in the world.
jdean1

Con

I am assuming that this is a round of acceptance. I put forward these rules for the debate:
1. Be cordial
2. Burden of Proof that the US uses hookers is on Pro
3. Both sides need to prove why we should or why we shouldn't provide funding for hookers

I think look forward to a good debate with Pro as long as they are serious.
Debate Round No. 1
pornstar666

Pro

pornstar666 forfeited this round.
jdean1

Con

My opponent has forfeited the round.

My whole case lies in that hookers are illegal as prostitution is illegal, therefore why should the government fund them? There is no economic, social or political benefit to such a move. Until Pro can come up with any argument on this matter, you must stand firmly in the negation.
Debate Round No. 2
pornstar666

Pro

pornstar666 forfeited this round.
jdean1

Con

My opponent has never rebutted any of my points or come up with any backing for their case or lack there of.
Debate Round No. 3
pornstar666

Pro

pornstar666 forfeited this round.
jdean1

Con

My opponent still has never rebutted any of my points or come up with any backing for their case or lack there of. And he has forfeited so I still win the debate.
Debate Round No. 4
pornstar666

Pro

pornstar666 forfeited this round.
jdean1

Con

I mean the decision is quite obvious.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Mr_Soundboard 3 years ago
Mr_Soundboard
Funding in what way? Medical/health funding? Housing?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Themba 3 years ago
Themba
pornstar666jdean1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not make any case whatsoever as he made an affirmative statement only in the first round. Con made a case in R2.Argument points are awarded to Con as well as conduct for the forfeits. Well Pro's name isn't that hospitable anyway, what can we expect.