Graffiti is art
Debate Rounds (5)
Art is an expression of beauty. How is something that disrupts some type of work already present a source of beauty? It is a distraction.
Graffiti: "pictures or words painted or drawn on a wall, building, etc." 
Art : "something that is created with imagination and skill and that is beautiful or that expresses important ideas or feelings " 
Graffiti is basically drawings, words and more drawn or written on walls. Art can be defined in many ways. As you can see, in the definition of art, it explains how it is something created trough imagination and skill. Art can be shown through many ways like visual art. Graffiti is a way to express emotion and creativity on to a wall. Though it is illegal, it is still art. Art is also viewed as creative and spontaneous. Graffiti is a way to quickly on the spot create a message. It's like spontaneous painting, but instead of a canvas, a wall, or a sign is used. Graffiti shows important messages, and feelings. These people who do graffiti are held back from art, and in result they take it out on the walls, where they are free, and don't need to follow rules. Graffiti can have various images, secret messages, and more using creativity and art to express. 
Graffiti is a way to illegally, spontaneously express emotion, mark territory and more, using art and creativity. Ergo, graffiti is a hated, misjudged form of art. Some graffiti is actually amazing. 
Vandalism is willful or ignorant destruction of artistic or literary treasures. (http://dictionary.reference.com...)
So. you are destroying art, not creating art.
Additionally by saying amazing you Are expressing your opinion and you are actually fueling this argument from your heart not brain.
www.spontaneouspainting.com is a commercial website and pinterest is a social website.
Art is, by your learner dictionary website definition, supposed to beautiful or be an idea, but you instead mess up the preexistent facade you use and block preexistent ideas.
"Vandalism is willful or ignorant destruction of artistic or literary treasures. (http://dictionary.reference.com......)
So. you are destroying art, not creating art."
Think of graffiti like photoshop. Sometimes, you find a picture, or art and you change it completely. You edit things, change the lighting and more. Sometime you change a picture completely, as if to change it to your perspective. Graffiti can be like this. Imagine a piece of art. You may see it as something beautiful and majestic, however a person may possibly see it as potential. They change it with things like scribbles, and words. It is not exactly destroying the painting, but actually changing it. Though some may just to graffiti randomly on this painting, it can still be considered art.
Now here are more arguments explaining how graffiti is art.
Firstly, anything can be art. It all depends on how someone perceives it. For example, you may see graffiti and vandalism, but someone else may see art that is forbidden, and hated. So if someone draws a scribble, it may represent something, or have hidden messages. . Many people perceive art through what is hidden, through what is behind the painting. What the painting is really trying to express. In the words of Napoleon Bonapart "A picture is worth a thousand words." 
Graffiti expresses hidden messages, and hidden thoughts, just like in art.
Secondly, graffiti is not only vandalism, it is a form of art. For example, when you draw graffiti on a piece of paper, it is still graffiti, not vandalism. Here are some examples.  So graffiti is not always connected to vandalism. Since vandalism according to your argument "Vandalism is willful or ignorant destruction of artistic or literary treasures." and graffiti can be done on paper without vandalising or destroying anything, it is considered art.
Also, graffiti is technically art, since graffiti is also known as street art. It literally has the word "art" in it.
In conclusion (thus far) graffiti is a form of art that portrays drawings, scribbles or symbols. This can be done illegally by being portrayed in areas accessible to the public, or simply drawn on paper or a canvas. When graffiti is done illegally, it is spontaneous and dangerous. However it is free, giving street artist no boundaries. Also these artist go against the world to demonstrate their ideas, their ideas that society has rejected. Ideas that only few people who truly see art for what it is, not for how it was done can understand. Graffiti is not only art, but it is more worthy of being considered art than many famous paintings such as the Mona Lisa. Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci was a loved man. He was a painter, sculptor, architect, musician, mathematician, engineer, inventor, anatomist, geologist, cartographer, botanist, and writer.  He was praised and loved, and his art work was as well. He could make a painting with ease and all would love him. He had little to fear when it came to his art. Street artist are forsaken, they have a lot to fear. However, they fight against the odds, and create amazing art that no one would except, but they were not scared, they did what they loved. Leonardo da Vinci loved his work also, but street artist had to fight for others to love their work to. So in conclusion, graffiti is a form of spontaneous dangerous art that is only excepted by few.
tanquish123 forfeited this round.
tanquish123 forfeited this round.
urapai forfeited this round.
On dictionary.com, vandalism is described as willful or ignorant destruction of artistic or literary treasures. So once again vandalism and graffiti are destruction of art not production of art.
"Ergo, graffiti is a hated, misjudged form of art." -It is hated because it destroys art, otherwise aren't we supposed to look at art fondly?
If graffiti is photoshop it is the 'erase button' and thus is not art. Even if it was function of photo shop it cannot be art itself so this photoshop option is very out of place.
In round 3 your analogy of old and new artists is very unuseful and is off-topic. Being afraid and whether graffiti is art are not at all related and only put confusion to your conclusion.
And to correct your last sentence in round 3-
So in conclusion, graffiti is a form of spontaneous dangerous crime that is only excepted by few who are in the same criminal profession.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Luggs 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||7||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to pro for con forfeiting twice, and posting a round that pro was unable to respond to. Pro had better S&G, in my opinion. Arguments and sources are self-explanatory.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.