The Instigator
Dirky
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
donovann97
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Greatswords Vs.Scimitars

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/28/2013 Category: Arts
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 681 times Debate No: 31809
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

Dirky

Pro

Greatswords are far better thatn Scimitars, challenge me people.
donovann97

Con

I agree that greatswords may be a good weapon, the scimitar is far superior. I accept your challenge
Debate Round No. 1
Dirky

Pro

Greatsowrds have far better range and can be wielded with both two hands and one, tests have been run where greatsords have lopped off three heads in a row, in one swing. Mind you, this is a standard with greatswords. Scimitars have a more aerodynamic design, but you can hardly slice an opponent with no head.
donovann97

Con

While greatsword are a very useful weapon, they are bulky and slow to swing. Scimitars, however, are quick and using one requires skill instead of the brawn that is required to swing a greatsword.
Debate Round No. 2
Dirky

Pro

Though it may be true that a great sword is quite slow and requires strength to wield, it is only a problem that it is slow when used by an incompetent person. In fact slowness can add greater ease in precision, and its weight makes it a meat cleaver to human bodies.
donovann97

Con

donovann97 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Dirky

Pro

Dirky forfeited this round.
donovann97

Con

donovann97 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Dirky

Pro

:3
It's a smiley face!
donovann97

Con

donovann97 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.