Gun Right, Again I Know, Extreme vs Withdrawn
Debate Rounds (4)
I'll go first. And by the way, I accept ;)
I believe, that while only a minority may share my point of view, that not only should weapons be easily accessible and that they should be regulated rarely. But I also believe that military grade firearms and vehicles should be accessible to the militias for the eternal preservation of these great states and the liberty of its people from complete federal control. I believe that its only fair that if the government can give this equipment to our law enforcement, that it is only fair that we too should be able to defend ourselves against corruption should it get out of control in the future.
Now, I leave it to Voiceless to present her point to you all.
I believe that the right to own any gun on the market is a dangerous right given to the people and a more peaceful solution can be created without the need for excessive firearm use.
I believe that certain powers are given to certain people who have worked for them and who have practice the protection of proper ethics and highly appreciated values.
I believe that giving gasoline (military grade firearms) to the public will result in an extreme inferno (the consequence of giving civilians military grade firearms) that could take America down one bullet at a time.
Just read the first of these ten examples if you don't believe me.
I can agree that people should be trained in the use of firearms and/or taught in the right sense of morals, after all, a weapon in the hands of someone untrained is in as much danger to themselves as they are to others. I can say that before you even think of giving military grade arms to a militia, or more relevantly the police force, that they best be taught the proper use so that you don't end up doing something stupid to ruin your life or others.
My opponent makes good, simple points; but I believe that she is still missing some valuable ideas in her arguments that could be of closer relevance. Therefor I shall leave my argument here, so that this conversation of ours can develop further before I press on into how this peoples militia should be run.
I now turn it over to Voiceless.
"Its evident in the news, and evident in our lives, that it is human nature to want to take things that do not belong to them or whom try to take things that cannot be taken willingly."
I completely agree. The founding fathers made this clear by allowing the people to have rights that protect their life, liberty, and pursuits of happiness. One of these rights is the right to bear arms; however, one must recognize that the arms that were available to them at that time were only able to fire about 7 rounds a minute. These days a semi-automatic rifle can fire over 180 rounds per minute.
I believe that a homeowner should be allowed to securely conceal a weapon in the house, but an unprofessional should not wander the streets with a gun. Take it from an incident in a Utah elementary school where a teacher accidentally shot the toilet (1).
Breaking down those 10 examples:
3 of the 10 examples were about off-duty officers and armed guards saving the day.
5 of the 10 examples were about homeowners defending themselves.
1 of the 10 examples was about a situation in a public places where the person didn't even use the fire arm in defense.
The last 1 of the 10 examples is about a neighbor helping a young girl in danger (I really applaud that by the way).
These cases explain how useful fire arms can be in self defense.
I will explain more in the next round.
And indeed, there seems to be the need for further reform of firearm distribution to people who have neither the training or morals necessary for someone to handle a gun. Such as we see in her example of toilet seat manslaughter at the hands of one inexperienced teacher ( I applaud her for that example :). As of now, I have no disagreement that people are indeed in need of proper training, lest they do something far more regrettable than discharge a firearm on a toilet.
But, as for my belief in arming organized militia with military grade weapons, it still stands. I can concur, that if such are eager to obtain the equipment, that they best purchase them with their own money such as even a government must to equip its own troops. It would make it far more difficult for the wrong men to get their hands on such the equipment, seeing as most that are mentally unstable and the like are less active in society and therefor less likely to amass the funds to purchase military equipment themselves, while allowing the common man in an organized militia to be able to protect themselves under the duress of any emergency.
Until next time, I give you Voiceless.
Now, there have been many situations where the police's morals and values have been in question; however, you must ask yourselves this:
If we cannot trust those who have earned the badge, then how can we trust random strangers with the same power?
A militia that is organized and armed with military grade weapons that come to the aid of the people in extreme conditions is called the military. They are so organized, in fact, that they have 5 different branches that specialize in their own ways of defense. "U.S. Armed Forces are made up of the five armed service branches: Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, Marine Corps, and Navy." (1) You can read more about them on their website that is provided below.
The U.S. Armed Forces undergo more thorough checks. They do not allow any members to have any current or treated mental illnesses which reduces the chance of power getting into the wrong hands.
The U.S. Armed Forces are trained in more difficult circumstances. They require their members to pass even the most difficult of tests, be extremely fit, and learn to
and will fight anywhere in the world to protect our freedom. They also meet the other criteria that you wish a militia had-- military grade weapons.
Now, we cannot only rely on those with the power to save us. What if we have no one else to defend us but ourselves?
I do think that guns should be available to the public. With the proper training, guns can be life-saving tools. Without the proper training, they can kill the innocent.
So, how would we go about regulating proper gun control laws? The people should be allowed their right to bear arms, but I believe this power should not be unlimited.
I will end this round with a famous quote.
"With great power comes great responsibility." - Spiderman
dbushwacker forfeited this round.
HAPPY HOLIDAYS! (:
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.