Harry Potter could beat Percy Jackson in a duel
Debate Rounds (3)
I repeat what I said earlier- harry just has to say stupefy and wave his wand, and percy has no chance.
harry just has to say stupefy and wave his wand, and percy has no chance.
Any evidence for your claim? Please elaborate on the effects stupefy would have on Percy because your conceded mind and shallow thought has failed to do so.
Stupefy, or the stunning spell, knocks the victim immediately unconscious (as you would know if you had read the books).
what can percy do to block it? Percy's power is limited to if there is water in the sorrounding. Harry could preform a vanishing charm on all water in the sourrounding area, and Percy would be defenseless. As soon as Percy is defenseless, Harry could perform his stunning spell, knocking Percy unconscious. If Percy tries to cause an earthquake, Harry could perform a levitation charm on himself and wouldn't be effected by it.
emospongebob527 forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by bossyburrito 4 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||4||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited and insulted Pro. He also did not put up any arguments of his own.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.