The Instigator
annisha.wazed
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
dtaylor971
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

Has any importances of traveling?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
dtaylor971
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/2/2013 Category: Places-Travel
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 711 times Debate No: 41581
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

annisha.wazed

Pro

Traveling is loved by all. What does the "travel" means? Travel means to roam one place to another for feeding our eyes, refreshes our mind and makes us cheerful.

Traveling is an extraordinary way of learning.Isn't it easy learning an abut to see that thing? Of course it is. we read picture and colorful books for that reason.

places travel also a same thing. where we see a thing and know some about it.It become to easy to understanding when we see a thing practically . It's easy to remember.
dtaylor971

Con

Thanks for debate topic. I only have 500 letters, so I'm going to mix my rebuttal with my argument.



You say that traveling is a nice thing. And sometimes, such as vacations, it is. But traveling can just as easily mean wandering through the desert in a blazing heat looking for food and water. Sometimes it means going from town to town looking for work and getting rejected. You only focused on one definition of traveling. Think of the others. So in all, traveling isn't all that great.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by 19debater19 3 years ago
19debater19
annisha.wazeddtaylor971Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: CON had a more through argument.
Vote Placed by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
annisha.wazeddtaylor971Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con wins. Really short debate, but they did their best. Pro was hard to understand. There was only 500 characters; pro could have made more of an effort. Con did a good job refuting an arguing at the same time. Con wins on flow. I wish though that con made a clearer argument about whether, in balance, traveling is good or bad. Then again, it's hard to understand exactly how Pro wanted the argument framed, so I guess it could be argued (s)he had a burden of proof. I love how Con used her/his few remaining characters to thank her/his opponent.
Vote Placed by yay842 3 years ago
yay842
annisha.wazeddtaylor971Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made many mistakes with grammar on the second and third section.