The Instigator
Rami
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Occisionis
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Having a Ph.D in Trollology doesn't make everthing you say a fact

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/16/2015 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 465 times Debate No: 77760
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (7)
Votes (1)

 

Rami

Pro

Occisionis constantly claims that since he has a Ph.D in Trollology, everything he says is a fact. I agrue against this.
Occisionis

Con

Anything I say is 100% correct because I have a PhD.
Debate Round No. 1
Rami

Pro

If you had a Ph.d in everything, it would be harder to argue that. But you only have a Ph.d in Trollology. You are a professional troll, not a perfect human being. Everything you say isn't the truth. You just have training in getting people upset on the internet.
Occisionis

Con

I can bend spacetime to my liking with my PhD, that means anything I say is right now even if it was previously wrong before I said it. Just talk to my professors.
Debate Round No. 2
Rami

Pro

Oh, I understand now. You are currently practicing Trollology. You spurt sentence to anger someone. That still doesn't make everything you same correct. Now tell me: Are you self-employed or working for someone? If it's the latter, who?
Occisionis

Con

I get paid to troll. I work for Mr. Trollhimself.
Debate Round No. 3
Rami

Pro

Well, if having a Ph.d makes everything you say true, then I have a Ph.d, and I say you don't. I also say you have to post 'lol' for your next argument in this debate.
Occisionis

Con

This is a serious debate so I will not post "lol". Getting a PhD is very hard and required decades of work.
Here is proof of my PhD:
Debate Round No. 4
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Occisionis 1 year ago
Occisionis
OOC:Btw I did that on purpose for giggles.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
****************************************************************
>Reported vote: Black-Jesus// Mod action: Removed<

5 points to Con (Arguments, Sources) and 1 point to Pro (Conduct). Hehe, PRO said that CON has to say "lol" and then CON says "lol" by saying that he wasn't gonna say "lol"

[*Reason for removal*] (1) Source and conduct points are completely unexplained in this RFD. (2) This is not sufficient or even comprehensible reasoning for determining who should get argument points in this debate.
******************************************************************************
Posted by Rami 1 year ago
Rami
So, trolls look like salt?
Posted by Occisionis 1 year ago
Occisionis
Troll troll
Posted by Rami 1 year ago
Rami
Are you a human troll or a troll troll?
Posted by Occisionis 1 year ago
Occisionis
159000-FG is troll time. If converted it equals 1945
Posted by Rami 1 year ago
Rami
Hah! The certificate is only valid in the future!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Commondebator 1 year ago
Commondebator
RamiOccisionisTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Im really tempted to give points to con, since pro didnt even give a bop. Trollogy is some serious stuff