The Instigator
Larsness
Pro (for)
Losing
18 Points
The Contender
pcmbrown
Con (against)
Winning
39 Points

Health Care

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 10 votes the winner is...
pcmbrown
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/18/2009 Category: Health
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,531 times Debate No: 8699
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (21)
Votes (10)

 

Larsness

Pro

Cheese is a luxouriouse item. I spelled that wring. Luxouriouse I mean. And now wrong is wrong. Well, it's actually wring, but it's meaning is wrong.

Wring- twist something forcibly and painfully: to twist something such as an animal's neck forcefully, usually causing pain or death

I guess I was wring on that too.

I wonder if anyone will challenge this.

Probably.

I wonder if I will lose.

Maybe.

Horrifying.

Inciting.

" This debate is pointless and should be removed."
Shut up.

No-one said that.

Yet.

Prove me right.

Or wrong.

Probably.
pcmbrown

Con

I'm just getting this off the challenge list.

I assume: "Resolved: Cheese is a luxurious item."

Cheese- a food consisting of the coagulated, compressed, and usually ripened curd of milk separated from the whey
Luxurious-of the finest and richest kind
Item- an object of attention, concern, or interest
From Merriam-Webster

Cheese encompasses a wide range of dairy foodstuffs. Some, like E-Z cheese, are certainly not the finest of their kind. They are a base foodstuff. Further, with such a wide range of foodstuffs, not all can constitute the finest of their kind, as some MUST be baser than others. Thus, not all forms of cheese are luxurious. Resolution negated.
Debate Round No. 1
Larsness

Pro

YOU DARE TRY TO CHALLENGE MY LOGIC!!?!?!?!?!?

A CHALLENGER APPEARS!!

French cheese is some of the best cheese.

French food stuffs are luxorious.

Your nonchalant attitude is monotinos.
As do you. Except for the fact of turtles.
Turtle-
1. U.S. water- or land-dwelling reptile: a water- or land-dwelling reptile with a body protected by a bony shell, e.g. a tortoise or terrapin
2. U.K.
Same as sea turtle

And since you challenged me you just lost the battle over conduct. That is derragatory and vile. I hope my fellow Debate.org/ers see the monstrosity's you have committed by challenging me.
I would also like to cite these video's as proof as to why you are wrong in this debate and wrong for challenging me.
pcmbrown

Con

French cheeses may be luxurious, but the entire category is not, as I've shown. Some cheeses are base, most are average. Obviously, not all cheese is luxurious. I'll go ahead and ignore the rest...if I lose S&G on this, I'll be terribly upset.
Debate Round No. 2
Larsness

Pro

You will indeed be upset. But probably not. You have failed to address any of my other points from round one besides the cheese. And ALL CHEESE IS LUXURIOUS PERIOD. NO TAKESY BACKSEYS. If He cannot address any other of my points and is wring about the cheese then I am victorious. But say I lose this debate, this so-called "debate.org" is obviously biased and not open to new revolutionary, state-of-the-art idea's. But, in the end, my fair friends, I will win.

But probably not.
pcmbrown

Con

My opponent presents no arguments or refutation. Not all cheese is luxurious, by definition, and by empirical evidence. The other points are irrelevant.
Thanks for reading. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 3
21 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Lexicaholic 7 years ago
Lexicaholic
Oh, it was a little funny. The sheer randomness of this debate made it something special.

Anyway ...

RFD: Con
(1) Tie. I have no idea what the resolution is.
(2) Con. At least his resolution makes sense.
(3) Con. He didn't directly attack his opponent with words like 'vile.'
(4) Con. Much better spelling and grammar.
(5) Con. He actually made an argument.
(6) Err... Well ... pro didn't really use 'reliable' sources but, well, he used more and I feel the need to offer a pity point. Pro.
Posted by sadolite 7 years ago
sadolite
Pointless inane babble and not even funny. Voted con for obvious reasons.
Posted by pcmbrown 7 years ago
pcmbrown
dude..that was totally unecessary
Posted by wjmelements 7 years ago
wjmelements
Why is the resolution "Health Care"?
Posted by Brock_Meyer 7 years ago
Brock_Meyer
C: Pro.
S&G: Con.
A: Tied. What arguments?
S: Tied. What sources?
Posted by Brock_Meyer 7 years ago
Brock_Meyer
I've never watched Fox news except out of curiosity. If I am forced to watch any cable news network, I prefer MSNBC: the "liberal" news network. And "Republican" is probably one of the most offensive things anyone can say to me, so thanks for that. I prefer "left-leaning libertarian", but I know you Marxists have a way with words.
Posted by Larsness 7 years ago
Larsness
Naughty Naughty, voting for yourself.
Posted by pcmbrown 7 years ago
pcmbrown
wow...thanks for the vote bomb =/
Posted by Larsness 7 years ago
Larsness
It is the popular belief of FOX news that Liberals are Socialists. I am therefore connecting FOX news with you, Republican
Posted by Brock_Meyer 7 years ago
Brock_Meyer
Notice I said "socialist", not "liberal".
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Lexicaholic 7 years ago
Lexicaholic
LarsnesspcmbrownTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:25 
Vote Placed by happypanda 7 years ago
happypanda
LarsnesspcmbrownTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by turdfu13 7 years ago
turdfu13
LarsnesspcmbrownTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:14 
Vote Placed by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
LarsnesspcmbrownTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by mongoose 7 years ago
mongoose
LarsnesspcmbrownTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by sadolite 7 years ago
sadolite
LarsnesspcmbrownTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Brock_Meyer 7 years ago
Brock_Meyer
LarsnesspcmbrownTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:11 
Vote Placed by slobodow 7 years ago
slobodow
LarsnesspcmbrownTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Larsness 7 years ago
Larsness
LarsnesspcmbrownTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by pcmbrown 7 years ago
pcmbrown
LarsnesspcmbrownTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07