The Instigator
MettaWorldPeace
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ShadowKingStudios
Con (against)
Winning
17 Points

Hell Debate: Demonstrating or Debunking the Biblical Concept of Eternal Torment

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
ShadowKingStudios
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/2/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 529 times Debate No: 61184
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

MettaWorldPeace

Pro

The debate is set up as follows: 4 rounds
Round 1: Accept Challenge
Round 2: Argument
Round 3:Argument/Rebuttal
Round 4: Rebuttal

The Burdon of Proof is equal--the person with the most convincing evidence in their favor wins the debate.

Biblical conception of Hell--(a.) Pro: an eternal place of fire and brimstone, physical torment and mental suffering; (b.) Con: an eternal place of where the dead go minus torment & suffering.

Traditional conception of God--All-loving
End of Time--Day of Judgment (Resurrection of the Flesh)
ShadowKingStudios

Con

Accepted.
Debate Round No. 1
MettaWorldPeace

Pro

MettaWorldPeace forfeited this round.
ShadowKingStudios

Con

My opponent has lost to his ff. Anyhow here is a Christian pastor exposing the control factor of Christianity and its use through reward & punishment through doctrines of heaven & hell.




Debate Round No. 2
MettaWorldPeace

Pro

MettaWorldPeace forfeited this round.
ShadowKingStudios

Con

There is no need for my second argument until my opponent can successfully refute this first one: Christian pastor exposing the control factor of Christianity and its use through reward & punishment through doctrines of heaven & hell. Argument extended.
Debate Round No. 3
MettaWorldPeace

Pro

MettaWorldPeace forfeited this round.
ShadowKingStudios

Con

There is no need for my second argument until my opponent can successfully refute this first one: Christian pastor exposing the control factor of Christianity and its use through reward & punishment through doctrines of heaven & hell. Argument extended.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by RichardCypher 2 years ago
RichardCypher
MettaWorldPeaceShadowKingStudiosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF. Con had convincing argument & source to back up his claim. Conduct for sticking with the debate. S&G was intact.
Vote Placed by Truth_seeker 2 years ago
Truth_seeker
MettaWorldPeaceShadowKingStudiosTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited and con made arguments that went uncontested.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
MettaWorldPeaceShadowKingStudiosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture