The Instigator
UtherPenguin
Pro (for)
Winning
27 Points
The Contender
bananaedmonkey
Con (against)
Losing
24 Points

Hiroshima was not nuked

Do you like this debate?NoYes+4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 11 votes the winner is...
UtherPenguin
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/10/2016 Category: Music
Updated: 9 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 879 times Debate No: 86340
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (6)
Votes (11)

 

UtherPenguin

Pro

This challenge is a part of the outlaws debate tourney.

Rules:

-BoP is on con
-only 500, characters allowed.
-Logical fallacies are allowed and encouraged
-Vote bombing is allowed and encouraged
-All Arguments in the third round MUST be in Spanish (Google translate is fine)
-All arguments after this round MUST be in Comic Sans
-I like cheese.
bananaedmonkey

Con

Case 1:
Pro is Hitler
Pro is Hitler because I say so and I can never be wrong because I say I can never be wrong.
dont vote for Hitler, vote con.

Case 2:
Pro likes cheese.
You can't trust someone who likes cheese.
vote Con

Case 3:
in kings 69:69 The bible says to always vote con.
If you dont think that kings 69:69 says always vote Con then you interpreted the passage incorrectly.

Case: 4:
BoP does not exist.
therefore i dont have to prove anything
vote Con

I look forward to a fun debate.


Debate Round No. 1
UtherPenguin

Pro

Case Juan: Pro wrote comic sans in round 1, COMIC SANS WERE SUPPOSED TO BE IN ROUND TWO!!!

Case two: I knew this one Japanese guy from two years ago who may or may not know someone from Hiroshima, ergo: I am in absolute authority to say Hiroshima was not nuked.

Case three: Bueno
bananaedmonkey

Con

Comic Sans



Case Juan: Juan is a mexican name therefore the donald trump rule dictates that it is invalid.

Case two: i met that guy, he was a lair.

Case tree: no Bueno

rebuttals

(ahah "butts")

let it be noted that Pro has dropped all arguements.


(ahah "ments")

notice how my arguements are in this box of Comic Sans. So one could say my argruements are "in" Comic Sans.

Comic Sans



Debate Round No. 2
UtherPenguin

Pro

Contención Juan: Mi oponente no ha logrado demostrar de forma clara su posición. I que se muestra la forma en Hiroshima no fue bombardeado porque sé que los japoneses que saben las personas japonesas de Hiroshima.

Contención dos: avatar Mi rival es un sombrero de fieltro, mi oponente es más, obviamente, un Judio. No tengo nada en contra de Judios, que sólo poner por ahí.

Contención tres: ¿Habla español?

Refutación: si bueno

* Gotas de micrófono *
bananaedmonkey

Con


Mi opponet acaba tratado de calumniar . Así que ahora yo le responde " No, no soy mexicano "

Debate Round No. 3
UtherPenguin

Pro

This is my opponent IRL:


I rest my case.
bananaedmonkey

Con

bananaedmonkey forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
UtherPenguin

Pro





please vote for pro, 1 like= 1 prayer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bananaedmonkey

Con

bananaedmonkey forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by JustAnotherDebator 6 months ago
JustAnotherDebator
Hiroshima was not nuked? I was like whaaat
Posted by CodingSource 9 months ago
CodingSource
"Poop has DNA" by imabench is way more funny than this one.
Posted by Wylted 9 months ago
Wylted
Strength of opponent- weak, barely showed up. I have to give him a 4

arguments- 500 round debate. It's kinda hard to judge, in that amount of space, but I really think you could have done better in that limited space. I would give you 5 here, but I think the genius structure is the best argument, itself. so bonus points. you get 6 points here

humor- More lame than funny, but good effort. 6 points

total points- 16
Posted by UtherPenguin 9 months ago
UtherPenguin
That debate was intense, I'm still sweating from the after taste.
Posted by bananaedmonkey 9 months ago
bananaedmonkey
this is a joke debate so be careful
Posted by CodingSource 9 months ago
CodingSource
I will watch how this debate goes. I'm new to this stuff.
11 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by famousdebater 6 months ago
famousdebater
UtherPenguinbananaedmonkeyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: The rules state that "vote bombing is allowed and encouraged". Since Con forfeited and broke the comic sans rule I have no choice but to VB in Pro's favor.
Vote Placed by David_Debates 6 months ago
David_Debates
UtherPenguinbananaedmonkeyTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Case three no bueno = good debater Better use of profile picture = better debater Not afraid to break the rules with comic sans = best debater
Vote Placed by Kirigaya-Kazuto 6 months ago
Kirigaya-Kazuto
UtherPenguinbananaedmonkeyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: I LOVE IT.
Vote Placed by fire_wings 7 months ago
fire_wings
UtherPenguinbananaedmonkeyTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Votebombing allowed.
Vote Placed by tejretics 8 months ago
tejretics
UtherPenguinbananaedmonkeyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: null
Vote Placed by lannan13 8 months ago
lannan13
UtherPenguinbananaedmonkeyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by CodingSource 9 months ago
CodingSource
UtherPenguinbananaedmonkeyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:43 
Reasons for voting decision: Vote bombs are allowed in this debate so....
Vote Placed by ssadi 9 months ago
ssadi
UtherPenguinbananaedmonkeyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Peepette 9 months ago
Peepette
UtherPenguinbananaedmonkeyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: CON broke the comic sans rule right off the bat. He used the Donald Trump rule to give himself a pass. Donald Trump is an arse; his reasoning had no merit. On Hiroshima: PRO contends he knows a guy who knows a guy who states that the bombing didn?t happen. Con rebuts man is a liar; a mere assertion. Con makes no attempt to argue the topic. PRO hit a low by inferring that CON was a Jew and Mexican, like there?s something negative about being either, not nice PRO. But, CON FFd two rounds of the debate which is an inexcusable sin against debates, violating Commandment #2 of the DDO Holy Book; punishable by loss of conduct points. S&G points tied due to not being unable to read Spanish, so can?t say if anything was off; English on both sides was readable. Sources to PRO due to good visuals.
Vote Placed by U.n 9 months ago
U.n
UtherPenguinbananaedmonkeyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture