The Instigator
Danononian
Pro (for)
Losing
35 Points
The Contender
SPF
Con (against)
Winning
71 Points

Hitler rose from the dead and ate everyone's brains for real

Do you like this debate?NoYes+5
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/5/2009 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 6,835 times Debate No: 8127
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (17)

 

Danononian

Pro

Dear Spf thank you for taking this argument as you know hitler came back from the dead in order to make a third reich out of radio active waste and then made monsters out of that nuclear waste which ressurrected Mel Gibson from the dead in order ot make a film that would have about 1 billion people watching it.

http://en.wikipedia.org...
SPF

Con

As you know hitler came back from the dead"
This assertion is one of the farthest things from the truth that I ever heard. Hitler did not rise from the dead, and danononian's link doesn't say anything that supports that as a fact.

"in order to make a third reich out of radio active waste"
Yet another assertion that came from my opponents imagination, unsupported by his own evidence.

"and then made monsters out of that nuclear waste"
The third time... but wait there's more.

"which ressurected Mel Gibson from the dead"
Not again.
Yes again.

"in order to make a film that would have about 1 billion people watching it."
The existence of 'Passion of the Christ' is the only true thing, and it is the only fact that is supported by my opponents link. Yet even this assertion is false because he says 'in order to' which ties this assertions to the false assertions.
There is one last rebuttal I left out that applies to all the assertions, and that is that they aren't only untrue, but impossible.
Debate Round No. 1
Danononian

Pro

Well SPF if u are going to judge me besides doing what is right like doing this debate then I suggest U get off because, u have no evidence hitler didn't do that because, he totally did, he got the uranium from the Russian Prime Minister of Canada and with that uranium he ate a burrito.

Here is Proof hitler is eating brains
http://media.comicvine.com...

This one is where hitler got the pot demons to make a large army of crazed mutant little hitlers
http://img210.imageshack.us...
SPF

Con

he got the uranium from the Russian Prime Minister of Canada"

Russian Prime Minister of Canada? Even if my opponent put president of Russia, why on Earth would the President of Russia, or the Prime Minister of Canada give him a nuclear bomb?

"Here is proof Hitler is eating brains."
Eating brains, that wasn't even part of danononian's first argument.
The 'proof' was a link to a fake picture of Hitler and superman morphed together.
"This one is where Hitler got the pot demons to make a large army of crazed mutant little hitters"

Once again not even remotely related to the original argument.
The proof was a link to a picture which didn't even have Hitler in it.
Debate Round No. 2
Danononian

Pro

My opponent seems to be angry with the fact that he is not winning this debate and further more he knows he can never win. We all know hitler had indian food and thats where he will get the bomb from also he got nukes from the saudi arabian president of Germany who then made fat little chubby white kids who have nothing to do because, Michael Bay is Making out with Hitler
SPF

Con

My opponent seems to be angry with the fact he is not winning the debate"
I'll leave that to the judges, but from my judgement this debate is a clear Con ballot considering Danononian used arguments far from truth, logic, and often, impossible to have been the truth in the first place. He used 'proof' that only seems to prove that he made up all his resolutions. I called him on it.

Danononian's remaining arguments fit into the category of based on no fact.
Debate Round No. 3
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Rob1Billion 8 years ago
Rob1Billion
I don't understand it either mongoose, Pro should have swept the floor with Con
Posted by mongoose 8 years ago
mongoose
And somehow, PRO gets 5/14 of the votes...
Posted by snelld7 8 years ago
snelld7
lol my fav debate!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Danononian 8 years ago
Danononian
srry guys here is the real proof
Posted by Danononian 8 years ago
Danononian
well its totally true, here is proof on a night when anne coulter and hitler were together

http://www.youtube.com...
Posted by Rob1Billion 8 years ago
Rob1Billion
Hitler must have been resurected; how else could we explain the ethical grounds for Conservative principles?
Posted by Alex 8 years ago
Alex
Con, why type all that when in the resolution it says "everyones" You havent had your brains eaten, i havent had mine eaten.

thats all thats needed as far as im concerned
Posted by bookwormbill111 8 years ago
bookwormbill111
Pro, way to stick it to your opponent and never give up. :)
Posted by I-am-a-panda 8 years ago
I-am-a-panda
If I could vote, all points to PRO
Posted by SPF 8 years ago
SPF
I have to say C-Mach is right, Danonian posted hilarious arguments
17 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by GeorgeCarlinWorshipper 6 years ago
GeorgeCarlinWorshipper
DanononianSPFTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by BlueNotes 7 years ago
BlueNotes
DanononianSPFTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Vote Placed by C-Mach 7 years ago
C-Mach
DanononianSPFTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by BlueVortex 7 years ago
BlueVortex
DanononianSPFTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Danononian 8 years ago
Danononian
DanononianSPFTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by rougeagent21 8 years ago
rougeagent21
DanononianSPFTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by snelld7 8 years ago
snelld7
DanononianSPFTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by mongoose 8 years ago
mongoose
DanononianSPFTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Rob1Billion 8 years ago
Rob1Billion
DanononianSPFTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by daboss 8 years ago
daboss
DanononianSPFTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70