The Instigator
Crinklestein
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Wylted
Con (against)
Winning
19 Points

Hitler started World War 2

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Wylted
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/5/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 685 times Debate No: 45238
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)

 

Crinklestein

Pro

He invaded Poland, he begun everything
Wylted

Con

I accept.

Hitler did not start world war 2. In fairness to my opponent I will wait until the next round to post arguments.
Debate Round No. 1
Crinklestein

Pro

Crinklestein forfeited this round.
Wylted

Con

On September 3rd 1939 France and Britain declared war on Germany. The war didn't start until that point. You can argue that Germany forced their hand, but the fact is it didn't officially start until France and Britain declared war.

http://www.worldwar2history.info...
Debate Round No. 2
Crinklestein

Pro

Crinklestein forfeited this round.
Wylted

Con

I rest my case.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
"Hitler invaded Poland; he began everything"
Posted by kbub 3 years ago
kbub
began*
Posted by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
I might take you up on this let me do some preliminary research real quick.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by codemeister13 3 years ago
codemeister13
CrinklesteinWyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF by Pro results in conduct to Con. S&G go to Con for a lack of mistakes in S&G. Con provided an argument and a source while Pro provided one baseless assertion before forfeiting.
Vote Placed by Tophatdoc 3 years ago
Tophatdoc
CrinklesteinWyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con wins the debate because he provided the facts. Con wins the source point as well. Good luck to you both in future debates.
Vote Placed by A.WitherspoonVI 3 years ago
A.WitherspoonVI
CrinklesteinWyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro completely conceded. Con had a compelling point, oh yeah, it was dropped as well. RFD is in the rounds.