The Instigator
EDFE
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Naruto_Usumaki
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Hitler was a British agent

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The Voting Period Ends In
02days06hours02minutes32seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/4/2017 Category: People
Updated: 1 week ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 277 times Debate No: 105501
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (15)
Votes (0)

 

EDFE

Pro

Hitler according to mainstream history was an an anti-semite of the worst kind and it's for that reason that he went hunting for Jews across Europe. But there's big holes in that theory.

If he wanted to kill the Jews we know that lead is cheaper than food. Why maintaining them for so long if ultimately he was to kill them?

Other questions were never answered by mainstream history. Why didn't Hitler block the Mediterranean sea when he had the chance. Why didn't he attack the British troop at Dunkirk when they were against the ropes?

The Balfour declaration was signed in 1917. The Zionist dream (prophecy) of a Jewish state was fulfilled but how to convince Jews to leave the comfort of Europe to settele in the desert? What better way than using a war to displace them.

The claim actually came from Hitler's sister.... She pretended that Hitler was trained by the British in 1912 when he was living with his brother in Liverpool.

Hitler is, according to Himmler's assistant and the US officer who did Hitler's psychological profile during WWII, Salomon Mayer Rothschild's illegitimate grand son. If true this would mean that Hitler was in fact a Jew himself.
Naruto_Usumaki

Con

Thank you for this Debate. The way I will be debating will be Quoting everything you say and my response to it, Then I give a Final response for Evidence towards the Con Side. Every one of my responses to your quoted statements will have a - next to it, To help indicate my responses from yours.

"Hitler according to mainstream history was an an anti-semite of the worst kind and it's for that reason that he went hunting for Jews across Europe. But there's big holes in that theory."

- Well He was a Anti Semite, But the Jewish weren't the only factor he hated. He believed in this Zionist Conspiracy that all the World Leaders were jewish Zionist people that deliberately screwed over Germany (Being as Germany really was screwed over at the end of WW1). He looked across the border and saw the newly Polish Government mistreating the Germanic Ancestors.

"If he wanted to kill the Jews we know that lead is cheaper than food. Why maintaining them for so long if ultimately he was to kill them?"

- Lead is indeed cheaper, But you got to consider that their ultimate goal was to execute an entire Religion of people. Being as Europe consisted of around 10 Million Jewish. Even 1 bullet would consist to 10million Bullets or much more (Compensating for if one bullet miss or if more than one bullet is needed to kill someone if they survive the first shot) This while adding to the factor that Hitler needed the Ammunition to fight the one going War with the Soviets. It is considered he wanted to wipe out the Slavics from Existence (If this is true) Then it would mean enough bullets to kill the entire population of the Soviet Union would be needed (Around 150million at the time). Also A lot of the people weren't fed at all, And the ones that were, Were only fed to keep them alive enough to be tortured with Experiments.. Starving takes around 60 days to kill someone.

- Not to mention that it would be more Convenient to make something (A Death Camp) that all though is expensive at first, Is more cost Effective to eliminate an entire Religion of people and as well, Eliminate all those who are seen as Undesirables.

"Other questions were never answered by mainstream history. Why didn't Hitler block the Mediterranean sea when he had the chance. Why didn't he attack the British troop at Dunkirk when they were against the ropes?"

- I found this answer, Because it was not Hitler"s order and that the request came from below. This rings true because it squares with the book Operation Barbarossa and Hitler"s Defeat in the East. That book was about a different theater, but showed how the Wehrmacht WW2 armored units got far ahead of the infantry units, often needed repairs, outran their supply columns, and were not prepared to receive attacks until their infantry, heavy artillery and supplies caught up with them. Blitzkrieg was exhausting for everyone on the German side, just as the Schlieffen Plan made the Germans march until they dropped in WW1. The French are probably not given enough credit for defending the Dunkirk area while troops waited for sea transport. A lot of Evidence supports that claim.

"The Balfour declaration was signed in 1917. The Zionist dream (prophecy) of a Jewish state was fulfilled but how to convince Jews to leave the comfort of Europe to settele in the desert? What better way than using a war to displace them."

- Well the land you are refering to was owned by the Ottoman Empire, however after it collapsed, The British took control of the land. Large disputes were always a concern for thousands of years over the Jewish beliefs vs the Muslim beliefs. Both having a complexed History with the city of Jerusalem. (All that is needed to know is that, It is a sacred place for both religions) Being as the Ottoman Empire no longer is existent, This would create a possible situation in which could result in the creation of a Muslim State this effectively causing problems for the Jewish who also hold ties there.

- Although your point could be considered on how a War would displace them, It also doesn't consider the fact that if there was this so called Zionist conspiracy that made the Holocaust happen, Wouldn't it be likely there is more an effective way to create Jewish tensions in Europe without executing the Jewish? Such as Deporting them from all Nations invaded or forcing them all to do labor.

"The claim actually came from Hitler's sister.... She pretended that Hitler was trained by the British in 1912 when he was living with his brother in Liverpool."

- Interesting because Hitler was in Vienna in 1912, His friend Describes him as "Hitler continued the same lazy lifestyle he had enjoyed in Linz after dropping out of school. Kubizek described Hitler as a night owl who slept till noon, would go out for walks taking in all the sights, then stay up late discussing his ideas on everything from social reform to city planning. Hitler made no effort to get a regular job, considering himself far above that. He dressed like an artist and at night dressed like a young gentleman of leisure and often attended the opera." .

"Hitler is, according to Himmler's assistant and the US officer who did Hitler's psychological profile during WWII, Salomon Mayer Rothschild's illegitimate grand son. If true this would mean that Hitler was in fact a Jew himself."

- It is widely Considered that Hitler was indeed Jewish, His Grandfather was said to have been Jewish. Here is some Evidence I found. "In 2010, the British paper The Daily Telegraph reported that a study had been conducted in which saliva samples were collected from 39 of Hitler's known relatives to test their DNA origins and found, though inconclusively, that Hitler may have Jewish origins"

- So the conclusion is, Hitler was most likely Jewish. Heck he even bombed his home town of Vienna just to eliminate the evidence of him being Jewish. (Which still exists) Hitler is considered a deep Patriotic Man for Germany, He always held Germany dear to him. Even as a child he was fascinated with Germany. Interesting that Austria - Hungary he applied to be in the Military but was denied due to physical reasons, So he applied to the German army and was allowed in (Being as Germany was Desperate for soldiers).

- So having Hitler having served in the German army further created more Patriotism, It is said that he was ashamed of Germanys surrender in the War. So when Germany lost and got screwed over, He felt deep resentment towards the countries responsible (Mainly France). This Conspiracy of the World Leaders being Jewish that he believed in, Is one of the reasons why he didn't invade the United States in WW2. He saw the US as the biggest Threat thus as he saids in his book Mein Kompf (German for my story) He saids how the race mixing and open Immigration of people from all over the world, While adding to the idea of Jewish leaders. Makes the US the biggest Threat and most dangerous to deal with.
Debate Round No. 1
EDFE

Pro

Thank you very much for accepting this debate. I accept the terms you mentioned.

First and foremost I will declare:

1- All of my comments are based on intelligence source as related in a few texts for which I will give the reference after the quotation.

2- These information are far from the mainstream history related in school books and medias. We know the mainstream version but mainstream history has been proved many times over to be complete fabrication. We can take the American aboriginals history for example. True history is called "Knowledge of power" by intelligence agencies and is reserved for top officials. This very debate is based on that.

3- I'm French so forgive my limited vocabulary.

ARGUMENT 1 : HITLER WAS AN ANTI-SEMITE

- Thank you for this argument. Unfortunately you gave us the mainstream history of the events. I'm going to quote Hitler, Churchill (British politician) and the Tavistock Military Psych-Ops War School training line (British institute) all at the same time (isn't it ironic) because they've all said it in more or less the same words: "In wartime, we provide truth with a bodyguard of lies because it is so precious." Basically what it means is that lies are prevalent and truth is kept a very well guarded secret. So bringing the mainstream history argument is not only pre visible but far from the level of argumentation we are writing about here. Of course if there was a conspiracy to regroup Jews with the goal of creating the state of Israel maybe even Hitler didn't know about it. Information are compartmentalized even amongst the highest level officials. "JFK said there's someone behind the throne greater than the king himself" and I believe this is the case here once again.

As related in the previous comment Adolf Hitler was the 2nd and 3rd degree incestuous son of Alois Hitler who was the son of Maria Anna Schicklgruber and Salomon Mayer Rothschild. The Rothschilds control all of the world's central banks except for a few. They've been known to finance both sides of just about every conflict in history. WWII is not different as it's been shown that they've boosted Germany's economy through the Federal reserve and the Bank of England. Not to mention that the Balfour declaration was addressed to Lord Rothschild. In just about every situation when you need to get to the bottom of things, you must follow the money. In this case Hitler's money came from The Rothschild family.

Information from article:
Hitler Was Financed by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England
By Ian Greenhalgh - June 11, 2016
https://www.veteranstoday.com...

ARGUMENT 2: LEAD IS STILL VERY EXPENSIVE

You argue about the fact that lead would have been cheaper. Ammunition plants produce more than a million rounds everyday and that's just one manufacture. I don't believe that a few million bullets would have been the problem. Not only lead is cheaper than food but it is much cheaper than maintaining millions of humans for years. Cheaper than building concentration camps. Cheaper than transporting them to death camps. Cheaper than disposing of the body themselves. If you really want to get rid of Jews you slaughter them on the spot and let the local population deal with the bodies. The "modus operendi" is pretty clear here. Whatever the reason why he was regrouping the Jews, he wasn't trying to kill them.

ARGUMENT 3: HITLER'S FUNNY MOVES

Thank you once again for bringing the mainstream history point of view. The questions I asked were only two of a long list of Hitler's questionable moves as mentioned by Historian Henry Makow Ph.D.

"Why the Nazi war machine was financed and built by the Bank of England. Why Hitler was able to expand into the Rhineland without fear of retaliation. Why Hitler let 335,000 Allied soldiers escape at Dunkirk. Why Hitler attacked Russia before England was invaded or conquered. Why the Nazis never figured out their communications were compromised.
Why Hitler never sealed the Mediterranean at Gibraltar. Why the Spanish dictator Franco remained neutral. Why Hitler didn't conquer the oil fields of Russia and the Middle East. Why Hitler gave his racial policies priority over actually winning the war. Why I.G. Farben was never bombed, and became the CIA headquarters in Frankfurt after WWII. "

You unfortunately failed to explain why Hitler spared the lives of so many British soldiers in Dunkirk. Your argument doesn't really explain and instead distort the events. It is reported even in mainstream History that it was Hitler's decision to stop advancing on British troops. Not a failed chain of command.

"On May 24, 1940, the German army appeared to winning the war as Allied Forces were surrounded by land at Dunkirk. But instead of continuing the invasion, Hitler ordered his army to halt for three days, a decision that has puzzled historians for over 70 years."
https://www.express.co.uk...

ARGUMENT 4: JEWISH POPULATION DISPLACEMENT

If there is a better way to displace a population than to forcibly do so? I would love to read about it. He wasn't trying to create Jewish tension, he actively hunted all Jews in Europe. Selecting them by blood, not by affiliation or by politic views or by IQ or anything that would be considered a legitimate mean to get rid of a conspiracy within the Zionist ranks. Anyone with Jewish blood weather it was kids, old people, etc... were gathered. Does babies conspire against Germany and the world too?

ARGUMENT 5: HITLER WAS IN VIENNA IN 1912

Unfortunately we won't agree on that one. And once again you brought the mainstream history. Here's a quote from the Book "Hitler was a British agent" written by Greg Hallett: "The most authoritative book on Hitler has no knowledge of Hitler's activities during the two years and four months from January 1911 to 24 May 1913." Here's what Historian Henry Makow, Ph.D., United States have to say about Greg Hallett: "Greg Hallett offers persuasive circumstantial evidence that Hitler was a British Agent. As Hitler was in Britain 1912-13 other historians are guilty of sanitizing Hitler, giving him more credibility that he had. Hitler was a British Agent is a useful paradigm that clarifies many improbable events . . ." Adolph Hitler was in England in 1912-1913, a fact supported by his sister-in-law's book: "The Memoirs of Bridget Hitler"(1979). Many historians including Hitler biographer John Toland have ignored this startling information.

ARGUMENT 6: HITLER MAY HAVE BEEN A JEW

I think that we pretty much agree on this point.

"History repeats every sixty years plus or minus two years. To study the present day, the most effective starting point is to go back sixty years from the present historical figures and examine the training of their predecessors. In each war there are double agents that go right to the top. The more effective they are, the more compromised they are, and the more they are secretly protected afterwards, right through the ages. Wars are always created through double agents and compromised principles. Wars are always based on profit. Those who profit ignore the deaths. Those who suffer never get past the deaths. In this way it takes an unencumbered generation to illuminate the hoax of war. To create a war, you first have to invent a fictitious enemy and then go out and kill them without killing your own double agent. In most instances you have to grow the double agent and the enemy yourself. This has been common practice for over a century. Stalin began his British training in 1907 and Hitler began his British training in 1912. In both cases these double agents ended up as Heads of State running foreign countries given to them by their trainers. Stalin was from Georgia and was given Russia; Hitler was from Austria and given Germany." - Hitler was a British agent.
Naruto_Usumaki

Con

1. The Information I provided included one of Hitler's closest friends, Thus not really mainstream media information.

Claim: Hitler being an Anti Semite

" Thank you for this argument. Unfortunately you gave us the mainstream history of the events. I'm going to quote Hitler, Churchill (British politician) and the Tavistock Military Psych-Ops War School training line (British institute) all at the same time (isn't it ironic) because they've all said it in more or less the same words: "In wartime, we provide truth with a bodyguard of lies because it is so precious." Basically what it means is that lies are prevalent and truth is kept a very well guarded secret. So bringing the mainstream history argument is not only pre visible but far from the level of argumentation we are writing about here. Of course if there was a conspiracy to regroup Jews with the goal of creating the state of Israel maybe even Hitler didn't know about it. Information are compartmentalized even amongst the highest level officials. "JFK said there's someone behind the throne greater than the king himself" and I believe this is the case here once again.

As related in the previous comment Adolf Hitler was the 2nd and 3rd degree incestuous son of Alois Hitler who was the son of Maria Anna Schicklgruber and Salomon Mayer Rothschild. The Rothschilds control all of the world's central banks except for a few. They've been known to finance both sides of just about every conflict in history. WWII is not different as it's been shown that they've boosted Germany's economy through the Federal reserve and the Bank of England. Not to mention that the Balfour declaration was addressed to Lord Rothschild. In just about every situation when you need to get to the bottom of things, you must follow the money. In this case Hitler's money came from The Rothschild family."

- Although Hitler was Financed by various Jewish Firms and even the British, He however was done being financed by many many Corporations when the US crack down on those funding Hitler became known during the War. Even Henry Ford (With his Anti Semetic Views) Poured money into the Nazi Regime, Only for it to be cut off in 1942/1943 when the US government crackdown. The boost in Economy in Germany was due to many reason, Such the Versailles Treaty was to be unilaterally revoked, and the Saar Valley, which had been forcibly requisitioned by France, was to be remilitarized with the Rhineland. Various people were hired as Military personnel, Thus decreasing Unemployment and increasing the workers value for corporations while adding to factors such decreasing interest on Loans.

Claim 2: LEAD

"You argue about the fact that lead would have been cheaper. Ammunition plants produce more than a million rounds everyday and that's just one manufacture. I don't believe that a few million bullets would have been the problem. Not only lead is cheaper than food but it is much cheaper than maintaining millions of humans for years. Cheaper than building concentration camps. Cheaper than transporting them to death camps. Cheaper than disposing of the body themselves. If you really want to get rid of Jews you slaughter them on the spot and let the local population deal with the bodies. The "modus operendi" is pretty clear here. Whatever the reason why he was regrouping the Jews, he wasn't trying to kill them."

- Although in comparison of a massive production of bullets could be made. It however was also easier eliminate the concept of bodies and the person via the Ovens and the Gas Chamber. because of course the bodies were often destroyed in the ovens used, While a Gas Chambers could kill mass's amount of people in a short amount of time in a Torturing slow way. I believe there was more to it then just the concept to murder them, It was also the concept to make them suffer. Many people given Hard Labor tasks such as pushing a bolder up a hill, only to have the bolder pushed back down so they have to push it back up.

It is also said that many people were not Necessary killed but instead used as free labor to fuel the War Machine (Many were forced to help build Nazi Tanks) . There was Evidence to conclude he killed people, But also the Evidence points that his intention was to not kill them at first but just use them as a form of labor or Deporation. it is heinrich himmler that is said to have given Hitler the idea for the "Final Solution".

Claim 3: HITLER'S FUNNY MOVES

Thank you once again for bringing the mainstream history point of view. The questions I asked were only two of a long list of Hitler's questionable moves as mentioned by Historian Henry Makow Ph.D.

"Why the Nazi war machine was financed and built by the Bank of England. Why Hitler was able to expand into the Rhineland without fear of retaliation. Why Hitler let 335,000 Allied soldiers escape at Dunkirk. Why Hitler attacked Russia before England was invaded or conquered. Why the Nazis never figured out their communications were compromised.
Why Hitler never sealed the Mediterranean at Gibraltar. Why the Spanish dictator Franco remained neutral. Why Hitler didn't conquer the oil fields of Russia and the Middle East. Why Hitler gave his racial policies priority over actually winning the war. Why I.G. Farben was never bombed, and became the CIA headquarters in Frankfurt after WWII. "

You unfortunately failed to explain why Hitler spared the lives of so many British soldiers in Dunkirk. Your argument doesn't really explain and instead distort the events. It is reported even in mainstream History that it was Hitler's decision to stop advancing on British troops. Not a failed chain of command.

"On May 24, 1940, the German army appeared to winning the war as Allied Forces were surrounded by land at Dunkirk. But instead of continuing the invasion, Hitler ordered his army to halt for three days, a decision that has puzzled historians for over 70 years."

- I explained already why the Germans haulted the Advance. Besides even if said decision was made by Hitler, This could be concluded that Hitlers original intentions weren't to go to war with England, However violating Beligum Neutrality proved it unavoidable. As to your other Questions.

"Why the Nazi war machine was financed and built by the Bank of England?" The Economy was funded, However the Germans used the Economy to fund their War Machine.

"Why Hitler was able to expand into the Rhineland without fear of retaliation?" Because neville chamberlain (Prime minister of England) Let Germany basically order him around. It is said the League of Nations were incompetent thus nothing stopping them from dissolving the Post WW1 Treaty.

"Why Hitler attacked Russia before England was invaded or conquered." Because they failed to take down England. Keep in mind, The failed Invasion of England occured almost a year before the invasion of Russia.

"Why the Nazis never figured out their communications were compromised?" How would they have known? The Battle Plans were carefully Decided, Various tricks were pulled.

"Why Hitler never sealed the Mediterranean at Gibraltar" It is said that Hitler didn't know the importance of Naval Warefare, He was obsessed with land Battles. Besides, It was Italys job to secure that area.

"Why the Spanish dictator Franco remained neutral." Because Spain had previously been in a Bloody Civil war and was in no place to fight in a World War, but he did however allow volunteers to serve in the German army.

"Why Hitler didn't conquer the oil fields of Russia and the Middle East." Because he held the African Countries that had the oil reserves. Besides, I believe his intention was to capture the oil fields once he secured it.

Anyways, My Character limit allowed is almost up, So I would love to answer more of your Responses but I am basically at my limit. I will hopefully get around to answer your Questions in the next round.
Debate Round No. 2
EDFE

Pro

Refutation: I think I can sum the refutation of the two aspects you answered in a single paragraph.

Your argument are claims for which you gave no reference or evidence. In a debate when someone gives a Ph.D in reference you have to prove or bring evidence suggesting the Ph.D is wrong because his credibility is greater than yours in regards to this topic. He is an expert in history. Most of your arguments are based on personal opinions rather than being supported by evidence. In a debate, the rule is to stay far from speculative argumentation. You also did not refer directly to the clear evidence I presented.

In this debate as in every debate there's rules. One of those rules is that you have to answer in a certain number of character. You give : "Character limit ", as a reason for not answering the last points I presented when the rule is clear. You wasted all your characters pasting my comments. There's no need to do that unless you purposely want to be limited. I believe this should not be accepted as a good reason. Round 3 is for final refutations and conclusion. If I can't refute your arguments how am I supposed to formulate a conclusion?

Conclusion:

In round two I presented solid circumstantial evidence that Hitler was in fact a British undercover agent. I quoted Historian Henry Makow Ph.D., a renowned author Greg Hallett and Bridget Hitler as a reference for the claims I've made.

I have established that:

-Hitler was in fact a Jew and he was part of the Rothschild family.
-He was funded before and during the war by the Rothschilds,
-He was trained in England in 1912,
-He made a series of decisions giving more than reasonable reasons to question his allegiance,
-It is irrational economically speaking to believe he regrouped the Jews to kill them,

Of course I kept the best argument for the conclusion. It has been uncovered through access to CIA declassified files and as part of the JFK assassination documents that Hitler was alive and well in South America after the war. It has been established as early as 1945 that Hitler had landed from a submarine in Argentina where he started his new life. The most important thing to remember is that all SS and Nazis were hunted down and some were even hanged after WWII. No one went looking for Hitler and instead the information in regards to his position were buried, classified. Which goes back to the final quote of round 2.

"In each war there are double agents that go right to the top. The more effective they are, the more compromised they are, and the more they are secretly protected afterwards, right through the ages."
- Hitler was a British agent by Greg Hallett

The situation is transparent here. Hitler was not hunted down by the allies even thought they knew he was alive and where he was. It means that he was, in the contrary, protected by allied forces. His escape was secretly planned for him a long time before his defeat. He lived a long life after the war without ever having any sort of problems giving the indications that Hitler was in fact, a British agent.

Here's an article about Hitler's post WWII life:

https://www.express.co.uk...

The official FBI documents:

https://vault.fbi.gov...
Naruto_Usumaki

Con

I will provide Links to my Claims. My Claims are Historical True, However the only problem has been not providing links to the Evidence. I didn't post your replies in attempt to limit the Character limit, But however did it to respond to each claim. Anyways

Evidence

Hitler was in fact a Jew (Which we both Agree on, So No need of Evidence).

He was funded before and during the war by many Coporations including Ford http://www.washingtonpost.com... https://www.globalresearch.ca...

Evidence that Hitler was in Vienna during the Supposed claims of Hitler being a "British Agent" https://worldhistoryproject.org...

Evidence of Hitler's affiliation with the Holocaust https://www.ushmm.org... https://en.wikipedia.org...

As to the Claim he fled to Argentina https://skeptoid.com...

"If I call up the FBI and tell them I just saw Barney the Purple Dinosaur crooning outside the White House with a ukulele, that report is going to be filed away somewhere. And if, years later, some Barney conspiracy theorist rolls a Freedom of Information Act request on it, that report is going to be a matter of public record. You would see exactly the same articles on the conspiracy theory websites as we have with the Hitler story: FBI Documents Prove Barney Serenaded the US President. It doesn't mean there's any truth to it; it only means someone reported it. Just like they still report Elvis sightings " and there are 663 pages in there about Elvis. Frankly, I'm surprised there are only 742 pages of crazy Hitler reports?"

The Claim that the FBI said he fled to Argentina is false, As seen here Debunking it https://www.snopes.com...

Evidence Concludes that Hitler died in Berlin during the end of the World War, It is in fact concluded that Hitler's remains were compared to relatives thus matching DNA Evidence.

Even a Former Body Guard describes Hitlers last moments http://www.independent.co.uk...

So Finally, It concludes that Hitler Died in Berlin, He wasn't the British spy. Thus finally Concluding that it wasn't an all Elaborate plot to make the Jews flee Europe to go to Established a Jewish state of Israel. The Concept of Israel has existed for Thousands of Years with huge tentions https://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 3
15 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by EDFE 9 hours ago
EDFE
@BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2

So.... you don't like the game you started young man? Next time if you don't want people to shut you up, just hold the stupid trolling comments! Cheers! :)
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 16 hours ago
BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2
@EDFE I don't give a fvck what you think!
You keep your destructive disrespect to yourself!
Posted by EDFE 2 days ago
EDFE
@BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2

Your beliefs are just that, BELIEFS!!! ;)

Meaning "conviction of the truth of a proposition or alleged fact without knowledge"

This sums it up pretty well! Keep having beliefs, I'll stick with the facts!
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 2 days ago
BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2
@EDFE you need counseling.
All of my beliefs are true.
Posted by whiteflame 2 days ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2// Mod action: Removed<

7 points to Con. Reasons for voting decision: Hitler clearly wasn't a British spy, Con by default.

[*Reason for removal*] Not an RFD.
************************************************************************
Posted by EDFE 3 days ago
EDFE
@BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2

-This paragraph of yours profoundly shows everyone what kind of 18 years old child you are. Your opinion is not even worth reading. You need a spanking little brat!

"God is not real 9/11 did not happen at all The Roast Game: Families literally ate their own children for 19 years Giving is a bad thing All The Christians Are Pretty Much Dead (By my personal mission experience) All Feminists Must Be Shot By Police Officers"
Posted by EDFE 3 days ago
EDFE
@BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2
Sense is a word which you dont know the definition of. The topic excedes your comprehension level.... That's all! ;) Cheers mate!
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 3 days ago
BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2
@EDFE no because you don't make any sense.
Posted by EDFE 4 days ago
EDFE
@BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2

Why not? Because you don't like it?
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 4 days ago
BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2
WTF? Why is this even a topic?
No votes have been placed for this debate.