The Instigator
Dagolas
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Spiritualsoul420
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

Hitler was a Nice person

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/15/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,090 times Debate No: 24726
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (4)
Votes (0)

 

Dagolas

Con

Hello,

This debate will be in 5 rounds. I shall take the position of Contender, and the following definitions will be used:

nice( nīs):(of a person) Pleasant in manner; good-natured; kind: "he's a really nice guy".

Hit´┐Żler (ˈhitlər): Adolf (1889–1945), chancellor of Germany 1933–45; born in Austria. He established the totalitarian Third Reich in 1933.

The debate shall be about Hitler being nice or not.

I thank my opponent in advance for taking up the debate, and look forward to debating this topic.
Spiritualsoul420

Pro

OK, this is my first debate ever, so I gladly take your challenge. If we use your definitions, pleasant in manner, good natured, well then right off the bat we can say hitler was not a nice person, because his nature was to exterminate all those who werent worthy, and was he pleasant in manner? well he was cracked out 24/7, so i think we can say that hitler was not a very nice guy. Exterminating another race does not qualify as being a "nice guy" even in the eyes of your own people
Debate Round No. 1
Dagolas

Con

My opponent seems to not have grasped the concept of being "Pro".
The Inquisitor/Pro has to convince people that the topic of Debate is true, and the Con false. My job was to prove Hitler was evil, you to prove he was a good man.

I win, vote Con.
Spiritualsoul420

Pro

no i didnt realize you were the con, your title is misleading
Debate Round No. 2
Dagolas

Con

Even if the title was misleading (which it is not) I clearly state in the 1st round that I was Con. Had you read it, you would have known.
Spiritualsoul420

Pro

Spiritualsoul420 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Dagolas

Con

Vote Con.
Spiritualsoul420

Pro

Spiritualsoul420 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Dagolas

Con

Dagolas forfeited this round.
Spiritualsoul420

Pro

Spiritualsoul420 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Dagolas 4 years ago
Dagolas
That's my point, Pro should have argued that he was a good leader for example.
Posted by vmpire321 4 years ago
vmpire321
lol fail
Posted by angrymen 4 years ago
angrymen
His actions may have been bad but in most of the video of him, he does seem like a nice guy.
Posted by Spiritualsoul420 4 years ago
Spiritualsoul420
And why would you debate this anyway
No votes have been placed for this debate.