The Instigator
ww54ww
Pro (for)
Losing
12 Points
The Contender
Jackie-Chan
Con (against)
Winning
63 Points

Hitler was a strong, powerful, and a good leader

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/8/2008 Category: Sports
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 4,589 times Debate No: 1538
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (7)
Votes (25)

 

ww54ww

Pro

Hitler was a Nazi. HItler was a blonde. HITler held his right hand up high and strong. HITLer killed many Jews. HITLEr was smart. HITLER ended up commiting suicide...
Jackie-Chan

Con

Hitler... brings to mind Stalin, Mao, Mussolini, and our current Hitler: Iranian president: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Oh, don't forget Bush (George W, and George H. W.). Your statement that Hitler was strong goes by unchallenged, except that you nor I have the powerful pass to retrieve mor personal information about Hitler. He was undoubtedly powerful to become a leader of so many. He was NOT a good leader however. In the Jews' perspective, the Holocaust was a racial disaster for the entire population? I ask, in rhetoric, how such a ghastly act as the Holocaust can reveal Hitler, the head of it, as a good leader? Obviously, Hitler may have been a strong, powerful leader, but he was UNDOUBTEDLY NOT A GOOD LEADER.
Debate Round No. 1
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Keithinator 9 years ago
Keithinator
Hitler wasn't blond...........................................................................................wow how is this enough characters yet
Posted by jlholtzapple 9 years ago
jlholtzapple
I think the pro didnt give much of a debate.
Posted by zacollins 9 years ago
zacollins
Hitler... So much to say so little room. Hitler was a brilliant leader. He was not a nice man, however, he was a great leader. He saw what the German people wanted as a whole and told them he was going to give it to them. He gave them the Volkswagon and highways and a stable govt. be back with more.
Posted by revleader5 9 years ago
revleader5
Hitler WAS powerful and strong. He was also a good leader. NOT in the sense that he was nice, but in the sense that he led a LOT of nazis. He had a very strong army. If you think about it, all dictators are good leaders, not nice, but good. They're good at what they do, or else they wouldn't be able to control such huge armies. PRO
Posted by dhanson4 9 years ago
dhanson4
He might'a kept his pimp hand strong, but I am pretty sure he was kind of a bad dude. Genocide isn't cool ALL the time...

Only good thing that came from good'ol Adolf was the interstate highway.
Posted by Darth_Grievous_42 9 years ago
Darth_Grievous_42
I noticed the slow progression of capital letter's in the word "hitler" ww54ww. But you did not give a strong enough point.
Posted by SocialistRI82 9 years ago
SocialistRI82
Hitler was a great leader. Dunkirk, his handling of that was great.......oh and then there's the whole Russian campaign, which I must say was masterfully played. Wait I almost forgot he used amphetamines, cocaine, and heroin all the hallmarks of a great leader. Hitler was a disaster for his people, country, and the world. How the hell can anyone even attempt to say that he was a great leader?? Its called history books, read them and learn.....
25 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by blond_guy 9 years ago
blond_guy
ww54wwJackie-ChanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by smelll4545 9 years ago
smelll4545
ww54wwJackie-ChanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by erkifish26 9 years ago
erkifish26
ww54wwJackie-ChanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by chris0705 9 years ago
chris0705
ww54wwJackie-ChanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by snoboguy1230 9 years ago
snoboguy1230
ww54wwJackie-ChanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Keithinator 9 years ago
Keithinator
ww54wwJackie-ChanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by stevster 9 years ago
stevster
ww54wwJackie-ChanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by jlholtzapple 9 years ago
jlholtzapple
ww54wwJackie-ChanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Arjunk193 9 years ago
Arjunk193
ww54wwJackie-ChanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by revleader5 9 years ago
revleader5
ww54wwJackie-ChanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30