The Instigator
Jonathan11
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
kimmi
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points

Hollister or Aeropostale

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Jonathan11
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/17/2013 Category: Fashion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,009 times Debate No: 37852
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)

 

Jonathan11

Pro

Pro: Hollister

Con: Aeropostale
kimmi

Con

Aero is just as good as holister
Debate Round No. 1
Jonathan11

Pro

Jonathan11 forfeited this round.
kimmi

Con

Aero aero aero
Debate Round No. 2
Jonathan11

Pro

My first point is that the Hollister establishment as been around since 1922 and Aeropostale being established in 1987 so Hollister being around longer allows them more time for the improvement of their product. One reason to why Hollister is superior to Aero is because of quality and the brand for those 2 reasons Hollister has crushed Aero in sales countless years. www.hollistersales.com
kimmi

Con

Aero has a lot of sells and hollister doent and aero aero aero
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by kimmi 3 years ago
kimmi
Proud of who may i ask
Posted by Michaelphelps 3 years ago
Michaelphelps
I am proud of you
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
Jonathan11kimmiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Round1 concession: If Aero is no better than the other brand, they would fail to be better; worse if the other brand is good enough to be the standard of measurement, why bother with the 'as good as' brand?